Worth Reading

Sometimes other articles or information come along that relate to what Rod’s Team is doing, so this will be the place to post and discuss them.  These are separate from the News thread.


97 Responses to Worth Reading

  1. Terri says:


    McAdoo was the first Chairman of the Fed Reserve Board

    Seems to me like there might just be a “conflict of interest” ….

    The billionaires are coming: Obama’s richest enemies to hold summit

    Amid great secrecy, about 200 of America’s wealthiest and most powerful individuals from the worlds of finance, big business and rightwing politics are expected to come together on Sunday in the sun-drenched California desert near Palm Springs for what has been billed as a gathering of the billionaires. This will be a meeting of “doers”, men and women willing to fight the Obama administration and its perceived attack on US free enterprise and unfettered wealth.

    This went out to all major citiess on first blog run starting second now
    Take the time & listen to the call of facts to information that has misled the American people for which now have Congressional records in hand for proof of the fraud.

  2. Terri says:

    “Always Argue Procedure” – Oh, And Always FOLLOW Procedure, Too !

    This is a sad tale out of Southampton Long Island, New York and we just could resist letting
    you know how important PROCEDURE really is. This is from RMN’s Patriotlad…


    Posted By: Patriotlad
    Date: Monday, 21-Feb-2011 13:32:50


    Nancy Genovese Lawsuit Updates:

    Town of Southampton in Default ~ Friday, February 18, 2011

    The Town of Southampton has failed to timely file an answer to the Nancy Genovese lawsuit, possibly leaving the taxpayers of the town on the hook for $70 million dollars. A motion for a default judgment has been filed against the Town of Southampton and Town of Southampton Police Officer Robert Iberger, and we are awaiting a decision by the court.

    So what happened, and how could the town fail to defend itself against such a large lawsuit?

    Michael C. Sordi, the Town Attorney for the Town of Southampton, represents both the town and defendant Robert Iberger, a Town of Southampton Police Officer. He is the attorney responsible for defending both the town and the Southampton Police, but as a result of personal issues, he inadvertently “forgot” to serve an answer. (Failed to FOLLOW procedure, we guess…)

    …full text at the website below.

    Before Michael Sordi was appointed as the Town Attorney for the Town of Southampton, he was the lead attorney in Nassau County in a high profile federal case involving excessive force by a Nassau County police officer. The county lost the case, and the jury awarded the plaintiff nearly $20 million dollars.

    Michael Sordi was fired by Nassau County shortly thereafter in December 2009. Republican County Attorney John Ciampoli claimed Mr. Sordi, as the lead council on the case, did not complete any prepatory work for several pretrial motions that needed to be filed. He stated “I would characterize that case as having been grossly mismanaged and mishandled by my predecessors in virtually every way that I could imagine.”

    Although town officials were aware of the Nassau County mess, they hired Mr. Sordi anyway. Last Friday, Michael C. Sordi, the Town Attorney for the Town of Southampton, was asked to submit his resignation [ February 11th ].

    Here, watch the video as the realization, after a bunch of bobbing and weaving, finally hits the town council members…It’s very heartrending ! LOL !

    This You Tube video of the Southampton Town Council arguing about the Genovese law suit is dated February 11th, 2011

    Mr. Sordi also had the town sign an agreement that the town will “fully, forever, irrevocably and unconditionally” release him from any liability in claims or lawsuits brought against the town.



  3. Doug says:

    The site looks great! But for some reason I can’t seem to open a lot of the links in the comment sections… i.e. when I try to open any link that begins with https:\\docs.google…I get an error. Thanks & keep up the good work

    Terri’s reply: Google docs deleted lots of what I uploaded, so I’m now using Scribd. All links posted here on the blog should work fine now. I apologize for the frustration.

  4. Terri says:

    Hey Doug, thank you for coming. 🙂 I just checked, and the link isn’t working for me either. I’ll have to see if I can run them down tomorrow. I appreciate you letting me know. Just another example of ‘it works until they fiddle with it’.

  5. Terri says:

    No law compels a private-sector non-governmentally-privileged work eligible man or woman to submit a form W-4 or W-9 (or their equivalents), nor to obtain or disclose an SSN as a condition of being hired or keeping one’s job. With the exception of an order from a court of competent jurisdiction issued by a duly qualified judge, no amounts can be lawfully taken from one’s pay (for taxes, fees or other charges) without the worker’s explicit, intentional, knowing, voluntary, written consent.

  6. Terri says:

    Jury Nullification Advocate Is Indicted

  7. Terri says:

    Main Steam Media being Atacked by REAL News:
    Hillary Clinton: “We Are Losing The Infowar”

    Paul Joseph Watson
    March 3, 2011

    Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made a tacit admission during a U.S. Foreign Policy Priorities committee meeting yesterday, arguing that the State Department needs more money because the US military-industrial complex is “losing the information war” to the likes of Russia Today and Al Jazeera due to the US corporate media having completely abandoned “real news”.

    “We are in an information war and we are losing that war,” warned Clinton, in a bid to rustle up more money to fund propaganda to compete with foreign news media, sending a clear message that stations such as Russia Today, which regularly provides a platform to the likes of Alex Jones, Max Keiser, Wayne Madsen, Paul Craig Roberts and Webster Tarpley, are winning the infowar against the globalists.

    An example of how frightened the establishment is of Russia Today occurred when adverts for the network encouraging viewers think about both sides of a story were banned by US airports last year.


  8. Terri says:


    For Release, March 2, 2011

    Daytona Beach – The ACLU of Florida today filed a legal challenge to an Administrative Order entered by Chief Judge Belvin Perry, Jr. of the Ninth Judicial Circuit. The Order bans protected speech on the Orange County and Osceola County Courthouse complexes. The ACLU’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari asks the Fifth District Court of Appeal of Florida to review and overturn the Order.

    The ACLU of Florida filed the Petition on behalf of the Fully Informed Jury Association (“FIJA”) and one of its supporters and volunteers, James Cox, who, until Judge Perry’s order, regularly spoke about jurors’ rights and distributed leaflets and other related educational materials at the Orange County Courthouse complex. Mr. Cox’s expressive conduct, and the FIJA materials he offered to members of the public focused primarily on jury nullification, sometimes referred to as “jury pardons.”

    Cooperating attorney Lawrence G. Walters, of Walters Law Group, and ACLU of Florida lawyers Randall Marshall and Maria Kayanan are asking the Fifth District Court of Appeal to vacate the January 31, 2011 order that bans the distribution of materials, oral protest, education, or counseling “intended to influence summoned jurors on any matter” which is, or may be pending before that individual as a juror. Penalties for violating the order include contempt of court citations, fines, confinement, or a combination.

    “The government cannot place preemptive restrictions on free speech just because it doesn’t like what is being said,” said Howard Simon, Executive Director of the ACLU of Florida. “Educating the public and jurors is not obstructing justice.”

    In the Petition, the ACLU of Florida argues that the ban violates the United States and Florida Constitutions, by censoring political speech and expressive conduct based solely on its content, with no compelling state interest, and imposes a prior restraint on that protected speech.

    “While a judge has the right to control his or her courtroom, that right must give way to the First Amendment right of a citizen to exercise free speech on the courthouse steps. The Order issued by Judge Perry crosses the constitutional line, and is so broad, it even prohibits lawyers from arguing their case to a jury,” said Walters. “We must protect even unpopular and controversial speech to give First Amendment rights ample breathing space they need to survive.”

    FIJA is a nonpartisan public policy research and education organization established in Montana in 1989. FIJA describes its mission as educating Americans about their rights and responsibilities when serving as jurors, including their powers of “jury nullification” or “jury pardon” by which, according to FIJA, jurors are encouraged to “vote their conscience” on a case.

    “Jury pardons are deeply rooted in American jurisprudence, even if they may be disfavored by judges,” Simon said. “No matter how unpopular or controversial a specific idea is, educating potential jurors about legal theory is not a crime. It’s protected speech.”

    FIJA supporters have refrained from speaking about their issues or distributing their literature at the courthouse since Judge Perry’s order was issued. “The judge’s order was clearly intended to single out constitutionally-protected expression which he disagreed with – namely, ours,” stated FIJA Executive Director Iloilo Marguerite Jones. “As an organization dedicated to protecting the rights of American citizens, FIJA is pleased to have the ACLU defending our rights in the courtroom.”

    A .PDF copy of the petition filed today is available here:

    A .PDF copy of the Appendix to the petition is available here:

  9. Terri says:

    Former Creek County Judge Convicted Of Indecent Exposure Arrested For Stalking

    CREEK COUNTY, Oklahoma — Former Creek County judge Donald Thompson was arrested again Thursday.

    This time, he’s been booked for stalking his ex-girlfriend.

    Thompson is the former judge who got caught using a sexual device while on the bench. He was found guilty in 2006, sentenced to four years in prison, and served less than half of that.

    Since he’s been out, he’s been arrested at least three times.

    6/7/2010 Related Story: Arrest Warrant Issued For Former Creek County Judge http://www.newson6.com/Global/story.asp?S=12610188

    Thompson was booked into the Creek County jail Thursday afternoon.

    An affidavit says his face is beat up because he got caught peeping into his ex-girlfriend’s bedroom window recently and her boyfriend beat him up.

    Read the affidavit

    This new arrest happened because police say he was caught spying on her again.

    Angela McClanahan says she got a flat tire on the way to work Thursday and pulled over in a parking lot in Sapulpa. She called police, saying Thompson was watching her.

    Sure enough, police say when they arrived, Thompson was parked across the street, watching her through binoculars. This is not her first flat tire. She told officer’s her tires have been slashed 23 times in the past two years.

    The affidavit says Thompson told them he saw her and the officers and just wanted to see what was going on, but they say his pants were unzipped and gaping open.

    McClanahan told officers Thompson has threatened to kill her in the past, if she called police. She told them, “he’s going to end up killing me.”

    “More than anything, she’s extremely fearful for her well being,” Major Jeff Gilliland, Sapulpa Police, said. “Everytime she turns around evidently, Mr. Thompson is standing there watching her.”

    Records show she filed for a new protective order late Thursday in Creek County.

    She had filed one against him in 2009 in Tulsa County, but it was dismissed a month later when she didn’t show up at court.

    7/6/2009 Related Story: Protective Order Filed Against Donald Thompson http://www.newson6.com/Global/story.asp?S=10651141

    She filed one just a few months ago in December in Creek County, but it was dismissed when the judge said there wasn’t evidence of an immediate threat.

    McClanahan had been subpoenaed to testify against Thompson at his indecent exposure trial, but refused to do so, which resulted in one count against him being dropped.

    Thompson has also been arrested for DUI and failing to pay his court fines since he got out of prison.

    Thompson bonded out of jail Thursday evening.


  10. Terri says:

    Felon’s Right to keep and bear arms

    Esquire Eric Holder was served today with copy of this Case.
    Yep, I see hot weather this weekend in the District of Criminals.

    I suspect that they will do all they can to make this case disappear.
    Their wickedness is melting, melting, melting. Huh!

    The gun grabbers are loosing their control.

    Victor’s Notice & Demand To Strike

    Victor’s Memorandum of law

  11. Terri says:

    Revolutionary War began when British troops were sent to Lexington

    Notable Gun Quotes

    by Waverly Gun Club on Wednesday, 12 May 2010 at 05:21


    Pastor’s NOTE: What was the final straw of all the grievances against the English Crown that finally started the Revolutionary War?

    Was it taxation without representation, high tariffs, corrupt British officials, or the quartering of troops among the colonists? NO! The Revolutionary War began when British troops were sent to Lexington and Concord to confiscate American’s firearms and gunpowder! Gun confiscation was the match that lit the Revolutionary War.

    I could write endless pages about our ‘Right to keep and bear arms’, but I, Pastor Joe would rather let the “Experts” tell you in their own words – after all these are the men who wrote the constitution and the 2nd Amendment. Perhaps they know best.

    Second Amendment – The right to keep and bear arms.

    “A well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free state , the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

    “The whole of the Bill [of Rights] is a declaration of the right of the people at large or considered as individuals…It establishes some rights of the individual as unalienable and which consequently, no majority has the right to deprive them of.” –Albert Gallatin, October 7, 1789, New York Historical Society

    “…the people are confirmed by the next article in their right to keep and bear their private arms” – from article in the Philadelphia Federal Gazette June 18, 1789 at 2, col.2.

    “That the said Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of The United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms…” –Samuel Adams, Debates and Proceedings in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, at 86-87 (Pierce & Hal e, eds, Boston, 1850).

    “The prohibition is general. No clause in the Constitution could by any rule of construction be conceived to give to Congress a power to disarm the people. Such a flagitious attempt could only be made under some general pretense by a state legislature. But if in any blind pursuit of inordinate power, either should attempt it, this amendment may be appealed to as a restraint on both.” –William Rawle, A View of the Constitution 125-6 (2nd ed. 1829)

    “The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them.” –Joseph Story, called the father of America’s Jurisprudence, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States; With a Preliminary Review of the Constitutional History of the Colonies and States before the Adoption of the Constitution [Boston, 1833].

    “Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people’s liberty teeth and the keystone under independence.” –George Washington


    “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.” –Thomas Jefferson papers

    “It is not certain that with this aid alone [possession of arms], they would not be able to shake off their yokes. But were the people to posses the additional advantages of local governments chosen by themselves, who could collect the national will, and direct the national force; and of officers appointed out of the militia, by these governments and attached both to them and to the militia, it may be affirmed with the greatest assurance, that the throne of every tyranny in Europe would be speedily overturned, in spite of the legions which surround it.” –James Madison, Federalist No. 46.

    “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms, and be taught alike especially when young, how to use them.” –Richard Henry Lee, 1788, Initiator of the Declaration of Independence, and member of the first Senate, which passed the Bill of Rights, Walter Bennett, ed., Letters from the Federal Farmer to the Republican, at 21,22,124 (Univ. of Alabama Press, 1975)

    “Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?” –Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836

    “The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed.” –Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers at 184-8

    “The people are not to be disarmed of their weapons. They are left in full possession of them.” –Zachariah Johnson

    “A free people ought … to be armed …” –George Washington

    “… the people have a right to keep and bear arms.” –Patrick Henry and George Mason, 3 Elliot, Debates at 386

    “Arms in the hands of citizens [may] be used at individual discretion for the defense of the country, the overthrow of tyranny, or in private self-defense …” –John Adams

    “The great object is that every man be armed” and “everyone who is able may have a gun.” –Patrick Henry, in the Virginia Convention on the ratification of the Constitution. Debates and other Proceedings of the Convention of Virginia … taken in shorthand by David Robertson of Petersburg , at 271, 275 2d ed. Richmond , 1805. Also 3 Elliot, Debates at 386

    “Laws that forbid the carrying of arms…disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater … confidence than an armed man.” –Thomas Jefferson, quoting Cesare Beccaria in On Crimes and punishment (1764).

    “The supposed quietude of a good man allures the ruffian; while on the other hand, arms like laws discourage and keep the invader and the plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. The same balance would be preserved were all the world destitute of arms, for all would be alike; but since some will not, others dare not lay them aside…Horrid mischief would ensue were one half the world deprived of the use of them…” –Thomas Paine, Writings of Thomas Paine, at 56,1894, Thoughts on Defensive War (1775).

    “When firearms go, all goes; we need them every hour.” –George Washington

    “A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be the constant companion of your walks.” –Thomas Jefferson, The Encyclopedia of T. Jefferson, 318, Foley, Ed.

    When speaking in Virginia in a fiery speech for freedom, Patrick Henry proclaimed; “… an appeal to arms and to the God of hosts is all that is left us!”

    “The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it.” –Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers

  12. Terri says:


    THE 1933 CONGRESS Bank Bill Where is the power of Congress? Was is dissolved? Was it surrendered?

    Or taken away from them by VOTE:?

  13. Terri says:

    Atheists official charged with practicing law without license

    Official Opinion of Bob Hurt, SSM (Senior Stud Muffin)
    Have City and County officials in Polk County gone INSANE? Don’t they know that ANYBODY can quote law, write scolding letters to sheriffs, and put “Esquire” or any other personal description (like “Senior Stud Muffin”) after a name? Without committing UPL. For instance, I could refer to PDSO Sheriff Grady Judd as Grady Judd, Corrupt Jackass Sheriff of Polk County. Would I thereby commit a crime? No.

    Clearly, the officials in Polk County, including Lakeland, believe they can violate the laws and constitutions willy-nilly, in spite of their fraudulent oaths to the contrary. Who will hold them accountable if the Atheists of Florida don’t?

    I want to know this. Why didn’t the NewsChief’s intrepid reporters tell the truth about UPL? Why didn’t they explain that the crooks in government use the penalty statute 454.23 to persecute people who stand up for others in legal disputes, and to create a judicial services monopoly? Why didn’t they quote these brilliant analyses of UPL and related monopoies that Dr. George C. Leef wrote for the Cato, Mackinac, and others?

    *The Case for Repealing Unauthorized Practice of Law Statutes
    *The Case for a Free Market in Legal Services
    *Ending the Lawyer Monopoly [Mackinac Center]
    *Remake The Matrix
    *Why Law School Costs So Much – George C. Leef – Mises Daily
    *Piercing through Myths, Lies, and Stupidity by George C. Leef
    *Is Monopoly Good or Bad? | The Freeman | Ideas On Liberty

    I think it high time for journalists to take their heads out of their butts and start exposing crimes in and by Polk County’s Sheriff and State Attorney.

    In point of fact, the Legislature has not defined “Practice of Law.” It falls upon the people to plow through Florida Supreme Court rulings to discover its meaning. You know that will not happen. Not ever. This means that the law is UNKNOWABLE to the common folk regarding UPL. It also means that by defining the Practice of Law, the Supreme Court exceeds its constitutional authority. Why? Because no provision in the Constitution authorizes the Supreme Court to “legislate from the bench.”

    For this reason, a Sheriff should only arrest a person for UPL who asserts “I have authority to practice law” but who cannot prove such authority.

    Otherwise, the UPL statute becomes a tool to oppress people who try to help one other with legal problems or teach their children what the Constitution means.

    In other words, NOTHING should constitute the “Practice of Law” except professional behaviors of licensed attorneys. The same behaviors by non-attorneys cannot possibly constitute UPL so long as the practitioner does not claim licensed attorney status.

    Bob Hurt
    2460 Persian Drive #70
    Clearwater, FL 33763
    727 669 5511
    Donate to my Law Scholarship fund http://bobhurt.com/lawdonation.htm
    Subscribe to Lawmen E-Letter http://bobhurt.com/subscribetolawmen.htm
    Learn to Litigate with Jurisdictionary http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?ReferCode=HB0002

  14. Terri says:

    PIMCO SELL AS US TREASURY HOLDINGS: Are you prepared for the fall? Get ready forthcoming!

    THIS IS SOME SERIOUS STUFF! What do you think, pennies on the dollar AFTER
    the crash?

  15. Terri says:

    Congressional Record: “parties to have rights… representation by nonlawyers.”
    Another Ground to sue and Impeach Judges!

    Congressional Record: “parties to have rights… representation by nonlawyers.”

    page 5652

    Section 6

  16. Terri says:

    This type of camera was in the latest Scientific American Mag. This is an example of what ‘Big Brother is watching’ can mean. Scary!!!

    FASCINATING BUT SCARY!!! If you were there, they would know?

    You used to be able to get lost in the crowd, but not anymore. Double click on any area in the picture to bring the person closer. Or, just click the mouse and use the mouse wheel to bring them closer.

    This is a photograph of 2009 Obama Inauguration. You can see IN FOCUS the face of EACH individual in the crowd !!!

    You can scan and zoom to any section of the crowd. . . Wait a few seconds. Double click anywhere . And the focus adjusts to give you a very identifiable close up.

    The picture was taken with a robotic 1474 megapixel camera (295 times the standard 5 megapixel camera). Every one attending could be scanned after the event, should something have gone wrong during it.

    Click on:

  17. Terri says:

    Walker Todd – Affidavit of the Scam Banking System

  18. Terri says:

    Something for you all to think about this weekend!!

    Watch the Youtube clip….Part 1 of “House of Rothschild”….reveals how the Rothschilds got in charge of the World money system….all by plan, not by accident!

    The Man in Charge of the World; The Great Rothschild Exposing

    Video that briefly touches on how the Rothschild family is in current power, as well as a solution to the problem that faces us.

    Queen Elizabeth Fronts for Rothschilds (“Crown”)

    Israel belongs to the Rothschilds

    David Icke ☼ They Dare Not Speak Its Name … ROTHSCHILD ZIONISM


    Confessions Of A Former Jew

  19. Terri says:


    The federal authority establishing the Performance Management and
    Recognition System (“PMRS”) was repealed by Congress; and yet,
    it remains in a table of Delegations of Authority which are still found
    in the IRS Internal Revenue Manual (“IRM”):

    http://www.supremelaw.org/irm/part1/irm_01-002-045.html (archived here for evidence purposes)

    search for:

    approve Performance Management Recognition System Cash Awards

    Recommend to Treasury, monetary awards of $10,001–$25,000 ($5,001 or more for Performance Management and Recognition System (PMRS) Cash Awards) for any one individual or group

    Recommend an additional monetary award of $10,000 (total $35,000) to the President through Treasury.

    [end quotes]

    The IRM was given legal force and effect by the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998,
    but the original authority establishing PMRS was repealed by Congress in 1993,
    September 30, 1993, Public Law 103-89:



    Unfortunately, your request is not specific enough to allow
    us to conduct a search for the records that are of interest to

    you. For example, you have not stated the years for which you
    are interested in obtaining records. Please be advised that the
    PMRS has not existed for the last 3 years. In addition, it is

    our understanding that awards made under PMRS took the form of
    cash payments or quality step in-grade promotions. Therefore,

    the types of financial records associated with awards made under
    PMRS did not include the kinds of records mentioned in your
    request. It would be helpful if you could be more specific in
    describing the desired records.

    [end quote]

    Further discussion of this PMRS aka Kickback Racket is found in “The Cooper File” here:

    (no rebuttal(s) by any opposing party(s))

    Sincerely yours,
    /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
    Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
    http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
    http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
    http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
    http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

  20. Terri says:

    When elections are for sale, so is our freedom.

    Doris “Granny D” Haddock
    Court statement
    May 24, 2000

    Your Honor, the old woman who stands before you was arrested for reading the Declaration of Independence in America’s Capitol Building. I did not raise my voice to do so and I blocked no hall.

    The First Amendment to the Constitution, Your Honor, says that Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances, so I cannot imagine what legitimate law I could have broken. We peaceably assembled there, Your Honor, careful to not offend the rights of any other citizen nor interrupt the peaceful enjoyment of their day. The people we met were supportive of what we were saying and I think they–especially the children–were shocked that we would be arrested for such a thoroughly wholesome American activity as respectfully voicing our opinion in our own hall. Any American standing there would have been shocked. For we were a most peaceable assembly, until Trent Lott’s and Mitch McConnell’s police came in with their bullhorns and their shackles to arrest us. One of us, who is here today, was injured and required a number of stitches to his head after he fell and could not break his own fall. He was detained for over four hours without medical care. I am glad we were only reading from the Declaration of Independence –I shudder to think what might have happened had we read from the Bill of Rights.

    I was reading from the Declaration of Independence to make the point that we must declare our independence from the corrupting bonds of big money in our election campaigns.

    And so I was reading these very words when my hands were pulled behind me and bound: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it.”

    Your Honor, we would never seek to abolish our dear United States. But alter it? Yes. it is our constant intention that it should be a government of, by and for the people, not the special interests, so that people may use this government in service to each other’s needs and to protect the condition of our earth.

    Your Honor, it is now your turn to be a part of this arrest. If your concern is that we might have interfered with the visitor’s right to a meaningful tour of their Capitol, I tell you that we helped them have a more meaningful one. If your concern is that we might have been blocking the halls of our government, let me assure you that we stood to one side of the Rotunda where we would not be in anyone’s way. But I inform you that the halls are indeed blocked over there.

    They are blocked by the shameless sale of public policy to campaign contributors, which bars the doors and the halls to the people’s legitimate needs and the flow of proper representation. We Americans must put an end to it in any peaceful way that we can. Yes, we can speak when we vote, and we do. But we must also give our best effort to encourage the repair of a very broken system. We must do both.

    And the courts and prosecutors in government have a role, too. If Attorney General Reno would properly enforce the federal bribery statute, we would see lobbyists and elected officials dragged from the Capitol Building and the White House, their wrists tied, not ours. I would be home in New Hampshire, happily applauding the television news as my government cleaned its own house.

    In my 90 years, this is the first time I have been arrested. I risk my good name –for I do indeed care what my neighbors think about me. But, Your Honor, some of us do not have much power, except to put our bodies in the way of an injustice–to picket, to walk, or to just stand in the way. It will not change the world overnight, but it is all we can do.

    So I am here today while others block the halls with their corruption. Twenty-five million dollars are changing hands this very evening at a fund raiser down the street. It is the corrupt sale of public policy, and everyone knows it. I would refer those officials and those lobbyists, Your Honor, to Mr. Bob Dylan’s advice when he wrote: “Come senators, congressmen, Please heed the call. Don’t stand in the doorway, don’t block up the hall.”

    Your Honor, the song was a few years early, but the time has now come for change. The times are changing because they must. And they will sweep away the old politician –the self-serving, the self-absorbed, the corrupt. The time of that leader is rapidly fading. We have come through a brief time when we have allowed ourselves to be entertained by corrupt and hapless leaders because they offer so little else, and because, as citizens, we have been priced out of participation and can only try to get some enjoyment out of their follies. But the earth itself can no longer afford them. We owe this change to our children and our grandchildren and our great grandchildren. We need have no fear that a self-governing people can creatively and effectively address their needs as a nation and a world if the corrupt and greedy are out of their way, and ethical leadership is given the helm.

    Your Honor, to the business at hand: the old woman who stands before you was arrested for reading the Declaration of Independence in America’s Capitol Building. I did not raise my voice to do so and I blocked no hall. But if it is a crime to read the Declaration of Independence in our great hall, then I am guilty.

    See http://GrannyD.com
    Original Message—–
    From: Dennis Burke
    Date: Thursday, May 25, 2000 8:52 PM
    Subject: Granny D’s day in court

    90-year-old Doris “Granny D” Haddock was in court in the District of Columbia on Wednesday, May 24, to plead guilty to the charge of demonstrating in the Capitol building last April 21. Some 31 others were charged with her.

    The judge, Chief Judge Hamilton of DC federal district court, was silent after Doris made her statement. In sentencing, he said to Doris and the demonstrators [this is approximate until the court transcript becomes available]:

    “Sometimes some people are ahead of the law. It will change, catching up to where they are. In the meantime, some people like you have to act on behalf of the silent masses.” He went on for several minutes with a beautiful statement. We’ll get it on GrannyD.com as soon as possible. He could have imposed sentences of six months imprisonment and $500. Instead, he sentenced everyone to time already served, plus $10 (that was a reduced administration fee, not actually a fine. The usual fee is $50). He met with Doris in his chambers after the session and told her to “take care, because it is people like you who will help us reach our destiny.” Some of his clerks were in tears at the meeting.

    Doris and friends then went to picket the $26 million dollar Democratic Party fundraiser at the Washington MCI Arena, where $500,000 fat cats sat at tables on the arena floor eating barbeque and listening to the President and Vice President, while regular people –$50 contributors– paid $3 per bottle of water to watch them eat. Doris was well interviewed there by NPR and several newspapers. When Doris crossed the street in front of the security-bristling arena she was approached by a squad of six DC policemen and women. They wanted to meet her.

    Doris Haddock, called “Granny D” by her grandchildren, burdened by arthritis and emphysemia, walked 3,000 miles from California to Washington to deliver her message. And, deliver her message she did. Her statement before the court is reprinted below:


  21. Terri says:

    The 26th amendment (granting the right to vote for 18 year-olds) took only 3 months & 8 days to be ratified! Why? Simple! The people demanded it. That was in 1971…before computers, before e-mail, before cell phones, etc.

    Of the 27 amendments to the Constitution, seven (7) took 1 year or less to become the law of the land…all because of public pressure.

    I’m asking each addressee to forward this to a minimum of twenty people on their address list; in turn ask each of those to do likewise.

    In three days, most people in The United States of America will have the message. This is one idea that really should be passed around.

    Congressional Reform Act of 2011

    1. Term Limits.

    12 years only, one of the possible options below..

    A. Two Six-year Senate terms
    B. Six Two-year House terms
    C. One Six-year Senate term and three Two-Year House terms

    2. No Tenure / No Pension.

    A Congressman collects a salary while in office and receives no pay when they are out of office.

    3. Congress (past, present & future) participates in Social Security.

    All funds in the Congressional retirement fund`move to the Social Security system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social`Security system, and Congress participates with the American people.

    4. Congress can purchase their own retirement plan, just as all Americans do.

    5. Congress will no longer vote themselves a pay raise. Congressional pay will rise by the lower of CPI or 3%.

    6. Congress loses their current health care system and participates in the same health care system as the American people.

    7. Congress must equally abide by all laws they impose on the American people.

    8. All contracts with past and present Congressmen are void effective 1/1/11.

    The American people did not make this contract with Congressmen. Congressmen made all these contracts for themselves.

    Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, so ours should serve their term(s), then go home and back to work.

  22. Terri says:

    Former President of TBW Pleads Guilty to Fraud Scheme

    Department of Justice
    Office of Public Affairs
    Monday, March 14, 2011
    Former President of TBW Pleads Guilty to Fraud Scheme

    WASHINGTON – Raymond Bowman, the former president of Taylor, Bean & Whitaker (TBW), pleaded guilty today to conspiring to commit bank, wire and securities fraud, and lying to federal agents about his role in a fraud scheme that contributed to the failures of TBW and Colonial Bank.

    The guilty plea was announced today by Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer of the Criminal Division; U.S. Attorney Neil H. MacBride for the Eastern District of Virginia; Special Inspector General Neil Barofsky for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (SIGTARP); Assistant Director in Charge James W. McJunkin of the FBI’s Washington Field Office; Michael P. Stephens, Inspector General of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD OIG); Jon T. Rymer, Inspector General of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC OIG); Steve A. Linick, Inspector General of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA OIG); and Victor F. O. Song, Chief of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Criminal Investigation.

    Bowman, 45, of Atlanta, pleaded guilty before U.S. District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema in the Eastern District of Virginia. Bowman faces a maximum penalty of five years in prison on the conspiracy charge and a maximum penalty of five years in prison on the false statements charge when he is sentenced on June 10, 2011.

    According to court documents, Bowman admitted that from 2003 through August 2009, he and his co-conspirators, including former TBW chairman Lee Farkas, engaged in a scheme to defraud various entities and individuals, including Colonial Bank, a federally-insured bank; Colonial BancGroup Inc.; and the investing public. Bowman admitted that he knowingly and intentionally participated in a fraud scheme that caused Colonial Bank and Colonial BancGroup to purchase tens of millions of dollars of worthless assets, caused Colonial BancGroup to report false information in its financial statements, and artificially inflated the value of TBW’s mortgage servicing rights.

    Court documents state that in early 2002, Bowman learned that TBW began running overdrafts in its master bank account at Colonial Bank because of TBW’s inability to meet its operating expenses, which included payroll, servicing payments owed to third-party purchasers of loans and/or mortgage-backed securities and other obligations. In or about the fall of 2003, Bowman, along with Farkas and other co-conspirators, engaged in a series of fraudulent actions to cover up the overdrafts, first by sweeping overnight money from one TBW account with excess funds into another, and later through the fictitious “sales” of mortgage loans to Colonial Bank, a fraud scheme the conspirators dubbed “Plan B.” The conspirators accomplished this by sending mortgage data to Colonial Bank for loans that did not exist or that TBW had already committed or sold to other third-party investors. According to the statement of facts, Bowman believed that Plan B data included data for loans that did not exist and knew that without Plan B, TBW would likely fail and go out of business.

    TBW used its mortgage servicing rights (MSR) to collateralize a working capital line of credit at Colonial Bank, and it retained third-party companies to conduct periodic MSR valuations. According to court documents, Bowman admitted that he, at Farkas’s request, directed co-conspirators to manipulate TBW’s borrowing base by billions of dollars to artificially inflate the MSR valuations and to avoid a margin call.

    In 2005, TBW established a wholly-owned special purpose entity called Ocala Funding LLC, as a financing vehicle to provide it with additional funding for mortgage loans. The facility obtained funds for mortgage lending from the sale of asset-backed commercial paper to financial institutions. In his statement of facts, Bowman admitted that he learned from Farkas and other co-conspirators at TBW that within a year of its creation, Ocala Funding had a significant collateral deficit. As Bowman acknowledged, the government could prove that by August 2009, that deficit had grown to approximately $1.5 billion and that TBW had caused Colonial Bank and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) to falsely believe that they each had an undivided ownership interest in thousands of the same loans worth hundreds of millions of dollars.

    On Aug. 3, 2009, Bowman was interviewed by agents from the FBI and the Office of the SIGTARP. Today, Bowman admitted that he falsely stated to the agents that he was not aware of Plan B loans, and that he was not aware of any fraudulent activities between Colonial Bank and TBW.

    In August 2009, the Alabama State Banking Department, Colonial Bank’s regulator, seized the bank and appointed the FDIC as receiver. Colonial BancGroup also filed for bankruptcy in August 2009.

    In June 2010, Farkas was arrested and charged in a 16-count indictment for his role in the fraud scheme. His trial is scheduled to begin in April 2011. An indictment is merely a charge and a defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty. Desiree Brown, the former treasurer of TBW, pleaded guilty on Feb. 24, 2011, and Catherine Kissick, a former senior vice president of Colonial Bank and head of its Mortgage Warehouse Lending Division, pleaded guilty on March 2, 2011, for their roles in the fraud scheme.

    The case is being prosecuted by Deputy Chief Patrick Stokes and Trial Attorney Robert Zink of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Charles Connolly and Paul Nathanson of the Eastern District of Virginia. This case was investigated by SIGTARP, FBI’s Washington Field Office, FDIC OIG, HUD OIG, FHFA OIG and the IRS Criminal Investigation. The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) of the Department of the Treasury also provided support in the investigation.

    This prosecution was brought in coordination with President Barack Obama’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force. President Obama established the interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force to wage an aggressive, coordinated and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes. The task force includes representatives from a broad range of federal agencies, regulatory authorities, inspectors general and state and local law enforcement who, working together, bring to bear a powerful array of criminal and civil enforcement resources. The task force is working to improve efforts across the federal executive branch, and with state and local partners, to investigate and prosecute significant financial crimes, ensure just and effective punishment for those who perpetrate financial crimes, combat discrimination in the lending and financial markets, and recover proceeds for victims of financial crimes.


  23. Terri says:

    Social Security Card

    History Lesson on Your Social Security Card

    Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (& some older ones) didn’t know this. It’s easy to check out, if you don’t believe it. Be sure and show it to your kids. They need a little history lesson on what’s what and it doesn’t matter whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are Facts!!!

    Social Security Cards up until the 1980s expressly stated the number and card were not to be used for identification purposes. Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the message was removed.

    Your Social Security

    An old Social Security card with the “NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION” message.

    Our Social Security
    Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program. He promised:

    1.) That participation in the Program would be completely voluntary, No longer Voluntary!

    2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual
    incomes into the Program, Now 7.65% on the first $90,000

    3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year, No longer tax deductible!

    4.) That the money the participants put into the independent ‘Trust Fund’ rather than into the general operating fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program, and, under Johnson the money was moved to The General Fund and Spent!

    5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income.

    Under Clinton & Gore up to 85% of your Social Security can be Taxed!

    Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month — and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of
    the money we paid to the Federal government to ‘put away’ — you may be interested in the following:

    Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent ‘Trust Fund’ and put it into the general fund so that Congress could spend it?

    A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically controlled House and Senate.
    Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?

    A: The Democratic Party.
    Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?

    A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the ‘tie-breaking’ deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US
    Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?

    A: That’s right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party. Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!
    Then, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away! And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it! If enough people read and send this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve. Maybe not, some Democrats are awfully sure of what isn’t so. But it’s worth a try. How many people can YOU send this to?

    Actions speak louder than bumper stickers.


  24. Terri says:

    74 Miles Of Pipeline needed!

    This video from CONGRESS is an eye opener, FOLKS! IT’S GONNA KNOCK YOUR SOCKS OFF!!!

    The MEDIA did NOT tell us about this speech in Congress! Turn your sound up, and click below, then pass it on. It needs to be heard by all the American people.

  25. Terri says:

    Solving The Mystery Of Babylon The Great

  26. Terri says:

    Posted on 13th March 2011 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

    Baby Boomers, Barack Obama, Chris Christie, Egypt, Fourth Turning, GDP, Gen X, Great Depression, Inflation, Matt Romney, National Debt, Neil Howe, Newt Gingrich, Peak oil, Robert Strauss, Stimulus, TARP, Tunisia, Unemployment, Winston Churchill, World War II

    “Still, if you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed, if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not so costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no chance of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.” – Winston Churchill – The Second World War

    A butterfly flapped its wings in Tunisia creating a hurricane that is swirling across the globe, wreaking havoc with the existing social order and sweeping away old crumbling institutions and dictatorships. The linear thinking politicians, pundits and thought leaders have been knocked for a loop. They didn’t see it coming and they don’t know where it’s leading. An examination and understanding of history would have revealed that we have been here before. We were here in 1773. We were here in 1860. We were here in 1929. We are here again. The Fourth Turning has returned in its predictable cycle, just as Winter always follows Fall.

    Winston Churchill wrote the definitive history of World War II in 1948. His six volume history detailed the years from the end of World War I through the unconditional surrender of the Axis powers in 1945. Volume I in the series was The Gathering Storm. It covered the second half of the Unraveling and the first ten years of the last Fourth Turning Crisis period. The title fits perfectly with the mood and inevitability of what was destined to occur. All Fourth Turnings resemble Winter, with bitter cold options, biting winds of change, dark days, and destructive storms. The seasons cannot be averted. The Seasons of a year are predictable, as are the seasons of a human life. We’ve entered the Crisis (Winter) season of the latest Saeculum that began in 1946 and will climax sometime around 2025.

    “Reflect on what happens when a terrible winter blizzard strikes. You hear the weather warning but probably fail to act on it. The sky darkens. Then the storm hits with full fury, and the air is a howling whiteness. One by one, your links to the machine age break down. Electricity flickers out, cutting off the TV. Batteries fade, cutting off the radio. Phones go dead. Roads become impossible, and cars get stuck. Food supplies dwindle. Day to day vestiges of modern civilization – bank machines, mutual funds, mass retailers, computers, satellites, airplanes, governments – all recede into irrelevance. Picture yourself and your loved ones in the midst of a howling blizzard that lasts several years. Think about what you would need, who could help you, and why your fate might matter to anybody other than yourself. That is how to plan for a saecular winter. Don’t think you can escape the Fourth Turning. History warns that a Crisis will reshape the basic social and economic environment that you now take for granted.” – Strauss & Howe – The Fourth Turning

    The generations are aligned in such a way that an event, incident, or individual action that may have been disregarded or ignored ten years ago will now trigger a worldwide conflagration. The Boston Massacre occurred in1770 during Revolutionary Saeculum. Five colonists were slaughtered by British troops. The mood of the generations was not ready for a Crisis. It wasn’t until three years later that the Boston Tea Party ignited a spark that started a revolution. John Brown’s raid on Harper’s Ferry in 1859 was intended to start a revolution. The populace was not ready. One year later, the election of Abraham Lincoln lit the fuse on the most horrific war in modern history. America experienced a sharp depression in 1920-1921. The country did not spiral into a decade long downturn, culminating in a World War that killed 65 million people. The generational dynamic was not aligned in a way that would lead to that outcome. Instead, the roaring twenties commenced. On December 17, 2010 a man committed a seemingly inconsequential act that has ignited a worldwide firestorm.

    The spark that has enflamed the planet was struck by a 26-year-old Tunisian with a computer science degree named Mohamed Bouazizi, who unable to feed his family, was not allowed by his government to even get a permit to sell vegetables. Bouazizi publicly doused himself with gasoline, lit a match, and burnt not only his own body, but enflamed the consciousness of a world, and its inhabitants, being obliterated by the corrupt wealthy elites who rule the planet. In less than a month the brush fire started by this 26-year-old Tunisian had incinerated the despotic government of his country and forced its “president-for-life”, Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, to flee the country. The people’s coup in Tunisia, called the Jasmine Revolution, has sent shockwaves across the globe, spreading wildfires of freedom throughout the Arab world. The firestorm started by Bouazizi has brought down Mubarak in Egypt and is lapping at the heals of Gaddafi in Libya. Tyrants throughout the world are quivering with fear. The mood of the people across the globe has turned dark and angry. The political class and media are persistently surprised by the reaction of citizens to events during the Fourth Turning.

    Historians Robert Strauss and Neil Howe documented their generational theory in the 1997 book The Fourth Turning. People who prefer blind ideology and believe human existence is a straight line of progress scorn their work as fantasy and pure prophecy. So called progressives misrepresent the theory as predicting the future because they refuse to accept the fact that large groups of human beings of a similar age and having common experiences react in similar predictable ways. It irritates those with an unwavering belief in human individuality. They prefer to ignore the numerous example of mass hysteria throughout history. In just the last 10 years we have experienced an internet boom and a housing boom that convinced millions of Americans to act simultaneously in a foolish manner . The theory is so logical and measurable that even the most vacuous blond bubble head on Fox News should understand it.

    Strauss & Howe have been able to break Anglo-American history into 80 to 100 year (a long human life) Saeculums going back to 1435. Each Saeculum has four generations at different stages of their lives. A turning is an era with a characteristic social mood, a new twist on how people feel about themselves and their nation. It results from the aging of the generational constellation. A society enters a turning once every twenty years or so, when all living generations begin to enter their next phases of life. Like archetypes and constellations, turnings come four to a saeculum, and always in the same order. In 1997, Strauss & Howe knew when the next Fourth Turning would begin:

    The next Fourth Turning is due to begin shortly after the new millennium, midway through the Oh-Oh decade. Around the year 2005, a sudden spark will catalyze a Crisis mood. Remnants of the old social order will disintegrate. Political and economic trust will implode. Real hardship will beset the land, with severe distress that could involve questions of class, race, nation and empire. The very survival of the nation will feel at stake. Sometime before the year 2025, America will pass through a great gate in history, commensurate with the American Revolution, Civil War, and twin emergencies of the Great Depression and World War II.” – Strauss & Howe – The Fourth Turning

    They did not predict events that would ignite the next Fourth Turning. It was how the generations reacted to the events that mattered. The generational constellation is now in the once every 80 year alignment that will lead to chaos, violent change, the sweeping away of the existing social order, and likely war. Strauss & Howe answered why this would happen fourteen years ago:

    “What will propel these events? As the saeculum turns, each of today’s generations will enter a new phase of life, producing a Crisis constellation of Boomer elders, midlife 13ers, young adult Millennials, and children from the new Silent Generation. As each archetype asserts its new social role, American society will reach its peak of potency. The natural order givers will be elder Prophets, the natural order takers young Heroes. The no-nonsense bosses will be midlife Nomads, the sensitive souls the child Artists. No archetypal constellation can match the gravitational power of this one – nor its power to congeal the natural dynamic of human history into new civic purposes. And none can match its potential power to condense countless arguments, anxieties, cynicisms, and pessimisms into one apocalyptic storm.” – Strauss & Howe – The Fourth Turning

    I believe my generation is about to experience a rendezvous with destiny. Each generation’s life experiences have prepared them for this hour and the trials that await them. The mood of the country has shifted darkly into a crisis mode. The mainstream media pundits and progressive politicians try to put a positive spin on today’s events, when anyone with the ability to think can see that things will get severely worse in the next ten years. Trust in our institutions, politicians, corporate leaders, media and social order is disintegrating. It’s a Matter of Trust

    “An initial spark will trigger a chain reaction of unyielding responses and further emergencies. The core elements of these scenarios (debt, civic decay, global disorder) will matter more than the details, which the catalyst will juxtapose and connect in some unknowable way. If foreign societies are also entering a Fourth Turning, this could accelerate the chain reaction.” – Strauss & Howe – The Fourth Turning

    The initial spark that ignited this Fourth Turning was the collapse of the housing market, which began in 2005 and continues today. Home prices collapsed, the fraudulent mortgage loans blew up in the faces of the Wall Street banks that birthed them, and millions of delusional Americans lost their houses in foreclosure. The cascading impact of this implosion brought the American empire of debt to its knees. On September 18, 2008 the U.S. financial system came within hours of complete collapse, as described by Congressman Paul Kanjorski on CPAN:

    “On Thursday (Sept 18), at 11am the Federal Reserve noticed a tremendous draw-down of money market accounts in the U.S., to the tune of $550 billion was being drawn out in the matter of an hour or two. The Treasury opened up its window to help and pumped a $105 billion in the system and quickly realized that they could not stem the tide. We were having an electronic run on the banks. They decided to close the operation, close down the money accounts and announce a guarantee of $250,000 per account so there wouldn’t be further panic out there.

    If they had not done that, their estimation is that by 2pm that afternoon, $5.5 trillion would have been drawn out of the money market system of the U.S., would have collapsed the entire economy of the U.S., and within 24 hours the world economy would have collapsed. It would have been the end of our economic system and our political system as we know it.”

    The implosion of the financial system was created by the actions of the Wall Street financers that have been looting the country for decades. They created mortgage products (no doc, liar loans, Alt-A, negative amortization) designed to encourage people to commit fraud. They purposely promoted this massive fraud because they had perfected the art of derivatives. The issuers of these fraudulent mortgages bore none of the risk from their guaranteed default. They packaged them into MBOs and MBSs, bought AAA ratings from Moodys, and shilled them to pension managers, insurance companies, municipalities, states, and little old ladies. Then they bet against their own products with credit default swaps. Their greed and avarice was so extreme, they leveraged their own balance sheets 40 to 1 and then bought their own toxic waste. When their MBA created models proved to be defective, the entire house of cards collapsed. Strauss and Howe anticipated a financial catalyst related to immense levels of debt would trigger the next Fourth Turning:

    It is unlikely that the catalyst will worsen into a full-fledged catastrophe, since the nation will probably find a way to avert the initial danger and stabilize the situation for a while.

    After the near collapse of the financial system in September 2008, the authorities took unprecedented actions to avert a Second Great Depression. Henry Paulson, the Goldman Sachs U.S. Treasury Secretary, who had warned his own staff that a Wall Street derivative disaster would happen, immediately reacted like a former Wall Street CEO. He convinced his Harvard MBA boss, George W. Bush, that the only way to save the country was to fork over $700 billion to the Wall Street banks that created the manmade disaster. When Congress initially voted down this banker bribe, Wall Street showed who was boss by crashing the market by 777 points in one day. The bought off politicians in Washington DC then towed the line and passed TARP.

    The two and one half years since September 2008 have set the stage for a far worse catastrophe. The Obama administration jammed an $800 billion pork filled stimulus bill down the throats of America, along with home buyer tax credits, loan modification programs, and a healthcare plan that will crush small businesses. The politicians, government bureaucrats, and mainstream media corporate mouthpieces proclaim that their wise and prompt actions averted a Second Great Depression. The government solutions used to “stabilize” the situation have wrought unintended consequences and planted the seeds of further pain and suffering to come. A summary of what has happened in the last few years is in order:
    On September 18, 2008 the National Debt stood at $9.66 trillion. Today it stands at $14.16 trillion, a 47% increase in 2 1/2 years.
    The country is running $1.5 trillion annual deficits and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future.
    The States are running cumulative budget deficits of $130 billion in FY11 and expect deficits of $112 billion in FY12. This is leading to conflicts with unions, higher taxes and mass layoffs of government workers.
    The working age population has risen by 5 million, while the number of employed Americans has declined by 6.5 million. The true unemployment rate http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/unemployment-charts has risen from 12% to 22%.
    In September 2008 there were 30.8 million Americans on food stamps. Today there are 44 million Americans on food stamps (14% of the U.S. population), a 43% increase in 2 1/2 years. The annual cost has risen by $37 billion, a 100% increase in 2 1/2 years.
    Real inflation http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/inflation-charts bottomed at 5% in early 2009, but has accelerated to 9% today, with further increases baked in the cake.
    Gasoline prices bottomed out at $1.61 per gallon in January 2009 and have risen to $3.54 per gallon today, a 120% increase in just over two years.
    Households have lost $6.3 trillion of real estate related wealth since the peak of the housing market. Home prices have fallen for six straight months.
    Almost 3 million homes have been lost to foreclosure since 2007.
    There are 11.1 million households, or 23.1% of all mortgaged homes, underwater on their mortgages today, with rates above 50% in Nevada, Arizona, California, and Michigan.
    Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were taken over by the US government and have lost $170 billion of taxpayer funds so far. Losses are expected to reach $400 billion. Along with the FHA, they continue to prop up a dead housing market with more bad loans.
    The Federal Reserve balance sheet in September 2008 consisted of $895 billion of US Treasury bonds. Today it totals $2.55 trillion of toxic mortgages bought from Wall Street banks and Treasury bonds being bought under QE2.
    The Federal Reserve and the Treasury Dept. intimidated the FASB into allowing Wall Street banks to account for worthless mortgage and real estate loans as fully collectible. Magically, insolvent banks became solvent – on paper.
    The Dow Jones was 11,700 in late August 2008 and today stands at 12,000. The Dow has risen 84% from its March 2009 low. The top 1% wealthiest Americans own 40% of all the stocks in America, so they are feeling much better.
    In late 2007, a risk averse senior citizen could get a 5% return on a 6 month CD. Today, after two years of no increases in their Social Security payments, a senior citizen can “earn” .38% on a 6 month CD.
    The Federal Reserve lowered interest rates to 0% in order to allow the Wall Street banks to borrow for free and earn billions without risk.
    Over 300 smaller banks have been closed by the FDIC, with losses exceeding $50 billion. There are another 900 banks on the verge of insolvency, with estimated future losses of $100 billion.
    The Federal Reserve initiated QE2 in November 2010, purchasing $70 billion per month of Treasury bonds and attempting to create a stock market rally. They have succeeded in creating a tsunami of energy, food, and commodity price inflation across the globe, sparking revolutions among the desperately poor in the Middle East.
    Wall Street banks “earned” record profits of $19 billion in 2010 after nearly destroying the worldwide financial system in 2008 and raping the American taxpayer in 2009.
    No Wall Street executive has been prosecuted for the fraudulent actions committed by their banks.
    Wall Street banks handed out $43.3 billion in bonuses in 2009/2010 for a job well done. The average Wall Street employee received a $128,000 bonus in 2010. In 2008, the year they crashed the financial system, they still doled out $17.6 billion in bonuses.
    The median household income in 2007 was $52,163. Today the median household income is $46,326, an 11% decline in three years. Real average weekly earnings are lower today than they were in 1971.

    It is clear from the list above that the oligarchic players that wield the power in this country have chosen to prop up their tottering structure of debt-created-wealth on the backs of the working middle class. The people who have been screwed and continue to be screwed are growing angry and distrustful, as anticipated by Strauss & Howe:

    “But as the Crisis mood congeals, people will come to the jarring realization that they have grown helplessly dependent on a teetering edifice of anonymous transactions and paper guarantees. Many Americans won’t know where their savings are, who their employer is, what their pension is, or how their government works. The era will have left the financial world arbitraged and tentacled: Debtors won’t know who holds their notes, homeowners who owns their mortgages, and shareholders who runs their equities – and vice versa.”

    The continuing foreclosure crisis has proven that the financial industry’s sole purpose in creating subprime loans, liar loans, Alt-A loans and packaging them into tranches with fake AAA ratings to be sold off to whatever sucker they could find was to enrich themselves with no care about the future consequences. The owners of the debt can’t prove they own the debt. Lawsuits clog up the court system. Deadbeats occupy houses for longer than two years without making a mortgage payment. Wall Street has created so many complex confusing financial products in their greedy thirst for fees that Harvard MBAs can’t even figure out the mess they have created. The $1.4 quadrillion of outstanding derivatives is truly a weapon of mass worldwide destruction waiting to be triggered. The fraudulent actions of Wall Street, the lies told to the American people by government bureaucrats about the solutions needed, the overstep and obfuscation committed by Ben Bernanke, and the propaganda fed to the masses by the corporate mainstream have destroyed the remaining trust in our institutions. Distrust grows by the day, as Strauss and Howe foresaw in 1997:

    “As the Crisis catalyzes, these fears will rush to the surface, jagged and exposed. Distrustful of some things, individuals will feel that their survival requires them to distrust more things. This behavior could cascade into a sudden downward spiral, an implosion of societal trust.”

    The growing distrust of financial and governmental institutions was reflected in the angry and sometimes violent town hall meetings with Congressmen during the healthcare debate. An angry on-air rant by financial reporter Rick Santelli ignited the Tea Party movement that eventually swept dozens of candidates into office in a Republican landslide in the 2010 mid-term elections. Societal trust in promises made by politicians is ripping apart. The entitlement benefit promises can’t be kept. Senior citizen and government union beneficiaries are angry. Younger generations don’t want to be left with debt so older generations can have comfortable 25 year retirements. Taxpayers don’t want to pay higher taxes to support gold plated healthcare and pension plans for government union workers. The decades of compromise, denial, apathy and lethargy are over. The mood of the country has changed dramatically. Survival of the country is at stake.
    Volcanic Eruption

    “America’s short-term Crisis psychology will catch up to the long-term post-Unraveling fundamentals. This might result in a Great Devaluation, a severe drop in the market price of most financial and real assets. This devaluation could be a short but horrific panic, a free-falling price in a market with no buyers. Or it could be a series of downward ratchets linked to political events that sequentially knock the supports out from under the residual popular trust in the system. As assets devalue, trust will further disintegrate, which will cause assets to devalue further, and so on. Every slide in asset prices, employment, and production will give every generation cause to grow more alarmed. With savings worth less, the new elders will become more dependent on government, just as government becomes less able to pay benefits to them.” – Strauss & Howe – The Fourth Turning

    The country has withstood the initial onslaught of this latest Fourth Turning. The Great Devaluation resulted in a 50% stock market crash and a 30% decline in home values. Rather than allowing home values to fall to their fair value, the government used tax credits and loan modification programs to prop up home prices. Rather than liquidating insolvent Wall Street banks in an orderly bankruptcy, the government and Federal Reserve chose to use accounting gimmicks and borrowed taxpayer funds to save those who had taken excessive risks and reaped hundreds of billions in profits. The government has systematically ”adjusted” every economic statistic in order to paint the most optimistic view possible. Unemployment, inflation, government debt, and GDP are all manipulated in the most positive light.

    Many people understand that you cannot solve a debt problem by issuing more debt. They understand that politicians have overpromised Social Security and Medicare benefits to the tune of $100 trillion. They understand that if you cover 30 million more people in your healthcare system, it will cost hundreds of billions more. They understand that mega-corporations have shipped their manufacturing jobs overseas, and they aren’t coming back. They understand spending $800 billion per year, policing the world, fighting two wars of choice, with hundreds of military bases across the globe is unsustainable. They understand that running $1.5 trillion deficits will eventually result in a collapse of the U.S. dollar. They understand that an individual or a country cannot borrow their way to prosperity. The U.S. government is essentially bankrupt and dependent upon Ben Bernanke’s printing press to keep up the appearance of solvency.

    Fingers of tension and instability run through every aspect of American society. Pressure is building beneath the surface. The last year and a half have proven to be a liquidity driven lull. The appearance of stability does not mean our situation has stabilized. The actions of those in power have created a vastly more dangerous scenario for the next decade. The volcano is erupting and the lava is flowing along the channels of distress, as described by Strauss & Howe:

    Imagine some national (and probably global) volcanic eruption, initially flowing along channels of distress that were created during the Unraveling era and further widened by the catalyst. Trying to foresee where the eruption will go once it bursts free of the channels is like trying to predict the exact fault line of an earthquake. All you know in advance is something about the molten ingredients of the climax, which could include the following:
    Economic distress, with public debt in default, entitlement trust funds in bankruptcy, mounting poverty and unemployment, trade wars, collapsing financial markets, and hyperinflation (or deflation)
    Social distress, with violence fueled by class, race, nativism, or religion and abetted by armed gangs, underground militias, and mercenaries hired by walled communities
    Political distress, with institutional collapse, open tax revolts, one-party hegemony, major constitutional change, secessionism, authoritarianism, and altered national borders
    Military distress, with war against terrorists or foreign regimes equipped with weapons of mass destruction

    Strauss & Howe did not predict specific events that would occur during the next Fourth Turning. As trained historians and economists, they simply analyzed the environment created by our leaders over the last few decades. If the thought leaders in the country had not been blinded by their ideological biases, they would have seen that the next Fourth Turning Crisis would be channeled by un-payable debt obligations, reckless financial schemes, religious ideology, political corruption, class warfare, foreign conflicts, and terrorism. The molten ingredients are travelling along the channels outlined above. What happens next is anybody’s guess.

    The economic distress worsens for the average American every day. The recovery propaganda circulated by the power elite through the mass media is a fraud. Only those with wealth and power have recovered. The middle class sinks further into poverty and despair. Unemployment remains at Depression levels and the entire economic faux recovery rests with Ben Bernanke’s printing press. The only question that remains is whether the United States experiences a deflationary collapse or a hyper-inflationary collapse. The country is currently experiencing stagflation as the things we need (energy, food, clothing) inflate, while wages stagnate and our home values deflate. Bernanke and his minions at the Federal Reserve will choose inflation as their poison because it will allow their banker masters to pilage the remaining wealth of the middle class before the final collapse of the U.S. dollar.

    Social distress has manifested itself over the last year in Arizona as the illegal immigration issue has turned violent, with State government and Federal government in conflict. The social welfare net is being strained through the payment of billions in unemployment compensation, food stamps, and other welfare programs. When this net breaks, all hell will break loose in the decaying urban Mecca’s. Political distress is at historic levels as the Tea Party battles liberals and its own neo-con Republican establishment. States are refusing to implement the Federally mandated Obamacare. Governors are battling teacher’s unions, firemen unions, and police unions in an effort to regain control of their out of control budgets. The 2012 elections could prove to be a tipping point for the country.

    Military distress is already extreme, even before a major conflict is thrust upon the country. The two wars of choice in the Middle East have drained trillions from the treasury of a declining empire. The all volunteer military has been stretched to the breaking point. The multi-billion dollar high tech weaponry has proven useless against “terrorists” who fade into mountains until they can strike again. As revolution erupts across the Middle East, the U.S. is helpless and has no credibility, as they have propped up the thugs and dictators who are slaughtering their people. The daily intensification of volcanic eruptions across the globe is clearly evident to all but the most linear thinkers. We’ve entered the Fourth Turning and there is no turning back.
    Prophecy or Destiny

    “Soon after the catalyst, a national election will produce a sweeping political realignment, as one faction or coalition capitalizes on a new public demand for decisive action. Republicans, Democrats, or perhaps a new party will decisively win the long partisan tug of war. This new regime will enthrone itself for the duration of the Crisis. Regardless of its ideology, that new leadership will assert public authority and demand private sacrifice. Eventually, all of America’s lesser problems will combine into one giant problem. The very survival of the society will feel at stake, as leaders lead and people follow. The emergent society may be something better, a nation that sustains its Framers’ visions with a robust new pride. Or it may be something unspeakably worse. The Fourth Turning will be a time of glory or ruin.” – Strauss & Howe – The Fourth Turning

    The election of Barack Obama in 2008 did not usher in a sweeping political realignment of the country. The actions he has taken in the last two years have maintained the status quo. The financial industry complex, military industrial complex, and big pharma complex are stronger and more powerful today than they were in 2008. The 2010 midterm elections were a decisive rejection of Obama’s policies. Those who think he will be re-elected in 2012 are not seeing the big picture. Previous Fourth Turnings have ushered in strong dominating Prophet (Boomer) leaders who used any means necessary to bring the country through the Crisis. Wishy washy politically calculating compromiser leaders do not cut it during a time of intense Crisis. The number of vulnerable Democratic Senators up for re-election in 2012 virtually insures that Republicans will control both houses of Congress in 2012. A legitimate 3rd Party candidate does not appear to be on the horizon. The onset of phase two of the economic meltdown will determine the next President of the United States.

    Before the 2012 elections, I expect a violent downturn in our economic fortunes spurred by a continued fall in real estate values, generating more debt losses for the financial industry, and a loss of confidence in the U.S. fiat currency, as our foreign creditors balk at lending more money to an already insolvent empire that is incapable of taking corrective budgetary actions. The resulting economic turmoil, crashing stock market, rising interest rates, and massive unemployment will lead the nation to seek a strong, decisive, authoritative leader who will boldly lead the country through the remainder of the Crisis. Will it be Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney, Chris Christie, or a Lincoln like figure who hasn’t even entered the national stage yet? This question is unanswerable today. But, the country will turn to someone with answers. Strauss and Howe clearly state how important the next 10 to 15 years will be:

    “Decisive events will occur – events so vast, powerful, and unique that they lie beyond today’s wildest hypotheses. These events will inspire great documents and speeches, visions of a new political order being framed. People will discover a hitherto unimagined capacity to fight and die, and to let their children fight and die, for a communal cause. The Spirit of America will return, because there will be no other choice. Thus will Americans reenact the great ancient myth of the ekpyrosis. Thus will we achieve our next rendezvous with destiny.”

    I’m convinced that decisive events will transpire over the next decade that will push our country to the brink. The country is on an unsustainable path and we will either crash and burn or take the actions needed to avert catastrophe. Vast powerful events on an incomprehensible scale await. Events as farfetched as a Weimar like hyperinflationary economic collapse, the detonation of a nuclear bomb in a major American city, the secession of one or more States from the Union, the collapse of our oil based economy due to peak oil and/or revolution and turmoil in the Middle East, or a worldwide pandemic, will become not only realistic, but probable. Are these events any more improbable than a 9.0 earthquake, leading to a 33 foot high tsunami wave, which triggers nuclear meltdowns at two separate nuclear power plants? If you had outlined that scenario a week ago, you would have been classified as a crazy prophet of doom.

    At this point in time, it doesn’t seem possible that a communal cause could rejuvenate the Spirit of America in a manner that would lead me to be willing to fight and die or send my three sons to fight and die. An imminent threat, such as the Axis Powers during World War II, the North and South seeing each other as a threat during the Civil War, or the threat from a foreign empire during the American Revolution, does not appear evident today. The war on terror is a concept, rather than a real war. The absence of a known foreign adversary makes me think that the conflict could center on our own soil between Americans. Strauss and Howe point out that history does not offer much hope in avoiding armed conflict during this Fourth Turning:

    “History offers even more sobering warnings: Armed confrontation usually occurs around the climax of Crisis. If there is confrontation, it is likely to lead to war. This could be any kind of war – class war, sectional war, war against global anarchists or terrorists, or superpower war. If there is war, it is likely to culminate in total war, fought until the losing side has been rendered nil – its will broken, territory taken, and leaders captured.”

    When it comes to what kind of armed confrontation, how about all of the above? The wealth distribution of the country is more heavily skewed to the “Haves” versus the “Have Nots” than any time in history. The austerity measures that are being proposed on the backs of the middle class and senior citizens, while ultra-rich bankers have been bailed out and allowed to continue pillaging the countryside, will surely lead to class conflict. Generational warfare between the Boomers who want what they are “owed” and younger generations stuck with the bill will flare up in the coming years. The country has become so ideological that it can be easily split into Red States and Blue States. Could this ideological divide result in the country splitting into two or three independent countries? Would the Federal government use the armed forces to maintain one country? It happened before.

    The war on terror concept has been in place for the last ten years and has resulted in draining the Treasury of trillions, exhausting our limited volunteer forces, and creating more terrorists than existed on September 10, 2001. The revolutions sweeping across Northern Africa and the Middle East are not cause for celebration in Washington DC. American foreign policy has centered on supporting thugs, despots, and dictators across this region with financial aid and weapons. The aid was absconded and sent to bank vaults in Switzerland. The weapons are being used to kill the poor revolutionaries across the region. Two American backed dictators have been deposed thus far, with Yemen likely to follow. Our allies in the region are falling with lightening speed. The loss of Saudi Arabia would portend dire consequences for the U.S. If the Middle East oil spigot is turned off, the American way of life will wither and die.

    The myth of American Exceptionalism will not protect the country from the revolutionary tsunami that is sweeping the globe. America was not chosen by God as the country that would lead the world for eternity. The hubris and overreach of the American empire has bankrupted the nation. Greed, corruption and arrogance are not limited to North African dictatorships. Crony capitalism supporting a vast military empire, financed by a banker controlled Federal Reserve has failed. Its failure will become clear as the Fourth Turning intensifies and sweeps away the old order. Who or what replaces the old order is unknown. Much will depend on the generations and their response to the Crisis.
    Bad Moon Rising

    Robert Strauss and Neil Howe had no interest in trying to predict the future. As historians, they wanted to understand how the past could give clues to what would happen in the future. They discovered a pattern of behavior by generational archetypes across centuries of Anglo-American history. They identified the issues that would drive the next Fourth Turning. They predicted the timing. The accuracy of their prophecy thus far, has been uncanny. The rhythms of history continue. The outcome of this Crisis is unknowable, but there is most certainly a bad moon rising.

    Thus might the next Fourth Turning end in apocalypse – or glory. The nation could be ruined, its democracy destroyed, and millions of people scattered or killed. Or America could enter a new golden age, triumphantly applying shared values to improve the human condition. The rhythms of history do not reveal the outcome of the coming Crisis; all they suggest is the timing and dimension. – Strauss & Howe – The Fourth Turning

  27. Terri says:

    There are no words to describe the tragedy unfolding in Japan. By now, most of us have seen the pictures and videos. Our hearts go out to those who have lost so much and are suffering so greatly. It is a testament to the Japanese people that thus far, there has been almost no societal breakdown in the face of such a catastrophe. No power … no water … no shelter. The store shelves are empty, half a million people are homeless … and yet there is very little unrest.

    A couple of days ago on Fox News, I heard a commentator remark that what’s happening in Japan can serve as a “teachable moment” for us. Indeed, we have a lot to learn from the Japanese as they face this crisis not only with stoic determination, but also with compassion for their fellow sufferers. Many people have commented on the lack of looting, crime, and chaos in the wake of this horrific tragedy. If something similar happened here, would we be as calm and orderly? I think we all know the answer to that, sadly, is “no.”

    Why is there no looting, no violence, and no anarchy?
    During Hurricane Katrina, we saw some of the worst of human nature – looting, violence, neighbors turning against neighbors. In the aftermath of the catastrophic earthquake and tsunami, it’s been a very different picture in Japan. But why?

    The “talking heads” on the news are telling us it’s because Japanese society is homogeneous. All the people share the same values, beliefs and habits. Compare that to the United States, where opinions and values are often polarizing. Cultural homogeneity may certainly be a large part of it, but that’s not all of it … not by a long shot.

    The main reason there is so little panic? No looting? No behavioral breakdowns that make us little better than the animals?

    It’s simple: the Japanese are, more than any other nation or culture on the planet, prepared.

    Preparedness is drummed into the citizenry constantly. Drills are held regularly. When an emergency strikes, nobody dithers around wondering what to do, whether to flee, and what to take with them. They already know. The decisions have been made ahead of time. Their calm, measured response is second nature because they’ve practiced it a hundred times. They are ready. (Sadly, we can’t say the same about American society.)

    What every Japanese citizen has … that most of us do not
    Every Japanese citizen has a survival kit stored near their front door at all times. In an emergency, they just grab it and go. Evacuation routes are marked and memorized. People know exactly where they are supposed to go in an emergency, and they are trained to go on foot instead of clogging up roadways with vehicles.

    It is precisely that high level of awareness and preparedness, I firmly believe, that prevents panic and chaos. When you know you’ll have access to emergency supplies of water and food, when you know where to find shelter, there’s no need to panic.

  28. Terri says:

    SPLC Ostracizes Patriots…Again
    Debbie Morgan, Host Securing Liberty Radio

    Columbia, MO, March 18, 2011 – It’s Spring and you know what that means. The Southern Poverty Law Center has issued its Spring Intelligence Report. The “Active ‘Patriot’ Groups in the United States in 2010” is always good entertainment. Since when is it bad to be considered a patriot? Along with the Spring publication, the SPLC has also issued a couple of other interesting pieces. One is “SPLC Report Examines Extremist Views of Lawmakers Attacking 14th Amendment” and the other is “The Legislators: The Dirty Dozen.”

    In a letter to Mark Potok, I ask since when is being a patriot a bad thing? And, not that I am sad about being labeled a “Patriot Group”, but since when do a films, websites or a film company constitute a “Patriot Group?” Potok is an award-winning mainstream journalist, having worked for USA Today, the Dallas Times Herald and the Miami Herald. So…what happened to his journalistic integrity?

    >> Read More at http://www.campfema.com/SPLC-Ostracize-Patriots-Again.html

  29. Deb says:

    I love this site. Thanks for putting this together for the greater good of all.
    Here is some worth reading… I looked up the work corporation and read everything and down under mercantilism I found this…….
    In the United States, government chartering began to fall out of vogue in the mid-19th century. Corporate law at the time was focused on protection of the public interest, and not on the interests of corporate shareholders. Corporate charters were closely regulated by the states. Forming a corporation usually required an act of legislature. Investors generally had to be given an equal say in corporate governance, and corporations were required to comply with the purposes expressed in their charters. Many private firms in the 19th century avoided the corporate model for these reasons (Andrew Carnegie formed his steel operation as a limited partnership, and John D. Rockefeller set up Standard Oil as a trust).
    Put when you click on the trust…….it takes you to….. trust (monopoly).
    A special trust or business trust is a business entity formed with intent to monopolize business, to restrain trade, or to fix prices.[1] Trusts gained economic power in the U.S. in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Some, but not all, were organized as trusts in the legal sense. Prominent trusts included Standard Oil,[2] U.S. Steel,[3] the American Tobacco Company[4] and the International Mercantile Marine Company.[5]

  30. Terri says:

    Here is an update on what the Pennsylvania Sheriff Brigades have been doing. Scroll down for Bill’s letter. Forward this far and wide. For those of you in a different State, perhaps you can implement this amongst your elected employees.

    If the elected employees choose to ignore these letters and proceed, the County Sheriff has the power to stand up to it. The question is, will he?

    For me, the answer is simple, it’s just a matter of keeping your oath.

    James Wicker
    Christian Soldier
    Armed Oathkeeper
    From: William Taylor Reil

    Hi All,

    Attached are copies of the last two documents that were hand-delivered to the Governor, Lt. Gov., Acting AG and each State Senator and State Representative on March 1, 2011 and March 15, 2011, respectively. I have also attached copies of the first two documents, just in case you missed them. They were delivered to the same recipients on January 31st and February 14th.

    I suggest that we start meeting with our State Senator and State Representative to discuss these documents and Sheriff Mack’s booklet; “The Victory for State Sovereignty”. We should also encourage other individuals and grassroots groups to get these documents, read them and meet with their respective State Senator and State Representatives.

    As you may know, we plan to prepare and hand-deliver a one or two page document to all of the previous recipients every two weeks. We hope that they will nullify “ObamaCare”, Real ID of 205 or the Food Safety Act of 2010 and then continue doing the same thing to other unconstitutional acts or actions by the Congress or the “President”.

    Please let me know what you think about these documents. Also, let me know if you need copies of Sheriff Mack’s booklet: “The Victory for State Sovereignty” at $1.00 per copy, plus the cost of mailing them to you; or the book: “County Sheriff – America’s Last Hope” at $5.00 per copy, plus the cost of mailing them to you. I have copies of both and if I run out, I will order another large quantity so as to be able to offer them at the reduced cost to you all. As you know the booklet sells for $2.00 and the Book sells for $8.00. Thus there is an opportunity for you to not only inform the people, but also make some cash for your group with these two items. Please let me know how many of each document you want.

    Keep up the good work and lets try to reach out to others in counties that do not have a County Sheriff Brigade. Just let me or Donna know if you know of someone who is interested in starting a Brigade and we will help bring them on board.

    Lastly, if you would like for Donna or me to speak with your group or at a open forum, meeting, special meeting or workshop, etc., please contact me or Donna. We want to help you inform the people about the truth. Often it is the individual from out of town that people will listen to.

    Yours in Freedom and Liberty,

    Nullification in a Nutshell-1.doc

    Real ID Handout for week 15 March 2011.doc

    The Victory For State Sovereignty letter-3.doc

    Nullification is the _Rightful Remedy_.doc

  31. Terri says:

    How we became slaves to oil

    Two facts:

    1. The biggest threat to the water supply of
    the world comes from the petrochemical

    2. One way or another, oil (in the form of gasoline
    and diesel fuel) is involved in everything we do
    and as the price rises, our standard of living

    It just happened that way, right?

    There was no alternative and we’re only just starting to get
    a glimmer of potential alternative fuels sometime way out
    in the future, right?


    The first cars ran on a non-toxic, renewable substance
    that we can create in our own communities for about $1 a gallon.

    So why aren’t we using it?

    The surprising history.


  32. Terri says:

    The Way the System Works
    The reason we have the duty to file complaints against judges and attorneys.

  33. Terri says:

    Debt-Collection Lawyer Is Forced to Close Up His Sleazy Shop

  34. Terri says:

    Always important to watch what is going on behind the scenes!!!

    U.S. Department of Justice WEBSITE CHANGE – IMPORTANT!

    Little by little the subtle changes come until one day we will wake up and be the United Socialist States of America. 2012 is just around the corner so get and stay engaged as if our nation depended on it because it does!!!!!

    U.S. Department of Justice ditches red, white, and blue stars and stripes.

    Well, how interesting! It seems the U.S. Department of Justice has changed its web site. Gone are the colorful red, white, and blue U.S. Flag decorations on the page. Replaced by stark black and white.

    And at the top of the page, is a rather interesting quote:
    “The common law is the will of mankind, issuing from the life of the people.”

    Catchy, huh? Just one tiny little (too small to be relevant obviously) point –the quote is from C. Wilfred Jenks, who in the 1930’s was a leading proponent of the “international law” movement, which had as its goal to impose a global common law and which backed ‘global workers’ rights.’

    Call it Marxism, call it Progressivism, call it Socialism — under any of those names, it definitely makes the DOJ look corrupt in their new website with Marxist accessories to match.

    See for yourself: http://www.justice.gov/

    How very interesting that ‘they’ couldn’t find a nice quote from one of our Founders. People, we have lost our Republic. This is an example of the slow, methodical misuse of power our current government is doing as they lead us to socialism, and destroying our republic as we have known it.

    Get ready for 2012

  35. Terri says:

    Check out ‘Amidst Growing World Doubts About 9/11, Career Army Officer Takes Bush Administration Officials to Court April 5th Represented by the Center for 9/11 Justice

  36. Terri says:

    Building 7

  37. Terri says:

    The Feds Finally Recognize The Anti-Cancer Potential Of Cannabis — 36 Years Too Late!

    Paul Armentano, Deputy Director NORML March 26, 2011

  38. Terri says:

    Pastor Chuck does a great explanation of the Supremacy clause. Look at all the Sheriff’s offices that went along with this federal theft. Wouldn’t happen if I were the Sheriff. The Commomwealth is above the Federal govt.

    Stay sharp

    James Wicker
    Christian Soldier
    Armed Oathkeeper

    The Bureaucracies That Marijuana Feeds
    By Chuck And Tim Baldwin
    March 26, 2011

    Archived column:

  39. Terri says:

    Leader of anti-government group pleads guilty to money laundering

    Sam Davis Memorandum In Support Of Guilty Plea

  40. Terri says:

    If you want to know what our government is going to do to us, read . . .




    and two sites I find I’m looking at every day are excellent references:



  41. Terri says:

    ATF whistleblower “ATF supplied 2700 ak 47’s to mexican drug cartels.”

  42. Terri says:

    Keep an eye on the USS Enterprise
    It could become another USS Liberty to get us into war with Iran.

    (Scroll down to the article below the ads)

  43. Terri says:

    Shotgun – take 3 minutes and read it

    You’re sound asleep when you hear a thump outside your bedroom door. Half-awake, and nearly paralyzed with fear, you hear muffled whispers. At least two people have broken into your house and are moving your way.

    With your heart pumping, you reach down beside your bed and pick up your shotgun.
    You rack a shell into the chamber, then inch toward the door and open it. In the darkness, you make out two shadows. One holds something that looks like a crowbar.
    When the intruder brandishes it as if to strike, you raise the shotgun and fire.

    The blast knocks both thugs to the floor. One writhes and screams while the second man crawls to the front door and lurches outside. As you pick up the telephone to call police, you know you’re in trouble.

    In your country, most guns were outlawed years before, and the few that are privately owned are so stringently regulated as to make them useless. Yours was never registered.

    Police arrive and inform you that the second burglar has died. They arrest you for First Degree Murder And Illegal Possession of a Firearm.

    When you talk to your attorney, he tells you not to worry: authorities will probably plea the case down to manslaughter. “What kind of sentence will I get?” you ask.

    “Only ten-to-twelve years,” he replies, as if that’s nothing. “Behave yourself, and you’ll be out in seven.”

    The next day, the shooting is the lead story in the local newspaper. Somehow, you’re portrayed as an eccentric vigilante while the two men you shot are represented as choirboys. Their friends and relatives can’t find an unkind word to say about them..
    Buried deep down in the article, authorities acknowledge that both “victims” have been arrested numerous times.

    But the next day’s headline says it all:
    “Lovable Rogue Son Didn’t Deserve to Die.”

    The thieves have been transformed from career criminals into Robin Hood-type pranksters..

    As the days wear on, the story takes wings. The national media picks it up, then the international media. The surviving burglar has become a folk hero. Your attorney says the thief is preparing to sue you, and he’ll probably win. The media publishes reports that your home has been burglarized several times in the past and that you’ve been critical of local police for their lack of effort in apprehending the suspects.

    After the last break-in, you told your neighbor that you would be prepared next time.
    The District Attorney uses this to allege that you were lying in wait for the burglars.

    A few months later, you go to trial. The charges haven’t been reduced, as your lawyer had so confidently predicted. When you take the stand, your anger at the injustice of it all works against you..

    Prosecutors paint a picture of you as a mean, vengeful man. It doesn’t take long for the jury to convict you of all charges. The judge sentences you to life in prison.

    This case really happened.

    On August 22, 1999, Tony Martin of Emneth, Norfolk , England , killed one burglar and wounded a second. In April, 2000, he was convicted and is now serving a life term..

    How did it become a crime to defend one’s own life in the once great British Empire ?

    It started with the Pistols Act of 1903.

    This seemingly reasonable law forbade selling pistols to minors or felons and established that handgun sales were to be made only to those who had a license. The Firearms Act of 1920 expanded licensing to include not only handguns but all firearms except shotguns..

    Later laws passed in 1953 and 1967 outlawed the carrying of any weapon by private citizens and mandated the registration of all shotguns.

    Momentum for total handgun confiscation began in earnest after the Hungerford mass shooting in 1987. Michael Ryan, a mentally disturbed man with a Kalashnikov rifle, walked down the streets shooting everyone he saw.

    When the smoke cleared, 17 people were dead.

    The British public, already de-sensitized by eighty years of “gun control”, demanded even tougher restrictions. (The seizure of all privately owned handguns was the objective even though Ryan used a rifle.)

    Nine years later, at Dunblane , Scotland , Thomas Hamilton used a semi-automatic weapon to murder 16 children and a teacher at a public school.

    For many years, the media had portrayed all gun owners as mentally unstable or worse, criminals. Now the press had a real kook with which to beat up law-abiding gun owners. Day after day, week after week, the media gave up all pretense of objectivity and demanded a total ban on all handguns. The Dunblane Inquiry, a few months later, sealed the fate of the few sidearms still owned by private citizens.

    During the years in which the British government incrementally took away most gun rights, the notion that a citizen had the right to armed self-defense came to be seen as vigilantism. Authorities refused to grant gun licenses to people who were threatened, claiming that self-defense was no longer considered a reason to own a gun. Citizens who shot burglars or robbers or rapists were charged while the real criminals were released.

    Indeed, after the Martin shooting, a police spokesman was quoted as saying, “We cannot have people take the law into their own hands.”

    All of Martin’s neighbors had been robbed numerous times, and several elderly people were severely injured in beatings by young thugs who had no fear of the consequences. Martin himself, a collector of antiques, had seen most of his collection trashed or stolen by burglars.

    When the Dunblane Inquiry ended, citizens who owned handguns were given three months to turn them over to local authorities.

    Being good British subjects, most people obeyed the law. The few who didn’t were visited by police and threatened with ten-year prison sentences if they didn’t comply.

    Police later bragged that they’d taken nearly 200,000 handguns from private citizens.

    How did the authorities know who had handguns?

    The guns had been registered and licensed.

    Kind of like cars. Sound familiar?


    “…It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people’s minds..”
    –Samuel Adams

    If you think this is important, please forward to everyone you know. You had better wake up, because your president is going to do this very same thing over here if he can get it done.. And there are stupid people in congress and on the street that will go right along with him.

  44. Terri says:

    Diane Sawyer has a special report coming up this week on this very subject. They removed ALL items from a typical, middle class family’s home, that were not made in the USA. There was hardly anything left besides the kitchen sink. Literally. During the special they are going to show truckloads of items – USA made – being brought in to replace everything. And will be talking about how to find these items and the difference in price etc.
    It was interesting that Diane said that if every American spent just $64 (more than normal) on USA made items this year, it would create something like 200,000 new jobs.

    Check the Can





    Are we Americans as dumb as we appear — or — is it that we just do not think? While the Chinese, knowingly and intentionally, export inferior and even toxic products and dangerous toys and goods to be sold in American markets.

    Yet 70% of Americans believe that the trading privileges afforded to the Chinese should be suspended.

    Well, duh..why do you need the government to suspend trading privileges?


    Simply look on the bottom of every product you buy, and if it says ‘Made in China’ or ‘PRC’ (and that now includes Hong Kong), simply choose another product, or none at all. You will be amazed at how dependent you are on Chinese products, and you will be equally amazed at what you can do without.

    Who needs plastic eggs to celebrate Easter? If you must have eggs, use real ones and benefit some American farmer. Easter is just an example, the point is do not wait for the government to act. Just go ahead and assume control on your own.

    THINK ABOUT THIS: If 200 million Americans refuse to buy just $20 each of Chinese goods, that’s a billion dollar trade imbalance resolved in our favor…fast!!

    The downside? Some American businesses will feel a temporary pinch from having foreign stockpiles of inventory. Wahhhhhhhhhhhh!!!

    The solution? Let’s give them fair warning and send our own message. Most of the people who have been reading about this matter are planning on implementing this on April 4th and continue it until May 4th That is only one month of trading losses, but it will hit the Chinese for 1/12th of the total, or 8%, of their American exports. Then they will at least have to ask themselves if the benefits of their arrogance and lawlessness were worth it.

    Remember, April 4th to May 4th (or, why not start right now)


    Send this to everybody you know. Let’s show them that we are Americans and NOBODY can take us for granted.

    If we can’t live without cheap Chinese goods for one month out of our lives, WE DESERVE WHAT WE GET!

    Pass it on, America.

  45. Terri says:

    Calling the Pope to account.

    The case number is OTP-CR-48/11.

    Calling The Pope To Account Ebook
    Read all 98 pages here

  46. Terri says:

    This is very much worth taking 5 minutes of your time to watch.

  47. Terri says:

    From Carl

    What kind of Judgment do you have?


    A court’s official decision on the matters before it. The declaration, by a court, of the rights and duties of the parties to a lawsuit which has been submitted to it for decision. Can also include an “injunction” a specific order to do or not to do something.

    A final decision made by a judge on a material issue during a case is termed a judgment. A judgment can provide all or a portion of the relief sought in a case, including property division, alimony, child support, custody or an injunction.

    In most states, the court order granting a divorce and ruling on the issues associated with the divorce (alimony, child support, custody, visitation and division of property) is called a decree. Decrees can be temporary, interlocutory (semi-permanent) or permanent. For all practical purposes, a decree is the same thing as a judgment.
    (2) The decision or sentence of the law given by a court of justice or other competent tribunal as the result of proceedings instituted therein for the redress of an injury.

    The language of judgments therefore is not that ‘it is decreed,’ or ‘resolved,’ by the court; but ‘it is considered,’ that the plaintiff recover his debt, damages or possession as the case may require or that the defendant do go without day. This implies that the judgment is not so much the decision of the court as the sentence of the law pronounced and decreed by the court, after due deliberation and inquiry.

    To be valid, a judicial judgment must be given by a competent judge or court at a time and place appointed by law and in the form it requires. A judgment would be null if the judge had not jurisdiction of the matter; or having such jurisdiction, he exercised it when there was no court held or but of his district; or if be rendered a judgment before the cause was prepared for a hearing.

    The judgment must confine itself to the question raised before the court and cannot extend beyond it. For example, where the plaintiff sued for an injury committed on his lands by animals owned and kept carelessly by defendant, the judgment may be for damages, but it cannot command the defendant for the future to keep his cattle out of the plaintiff’s land. That would be to usurp the power of the legislature. A judgment declares the rights which belong to the citizen, the law alone rules future actions. The law commands all men, it is the same for all because it is general; judgments are particular decisions, which apply only to particular persons and bind no others; they vary like the circumstances on which they are founded.

    Litigious contests present to the courts facts to appreciate, agreements to be construed, and points of law to be resolved. The judgment is the result of the full examination of all these.

    There are four kinds of judgments in civil cases, namely: 1. When the facts are admitted by the parties, but the law is disputed; as in case of judgment upon demurrer; 2. When the law is admitted, but the facts are disputed; as in, case of judgment upon a verdict; 3. When both the law and the facts are admitted by confession; as in the case of cognovit actionem, on the part of the defendant; or nolle prosequi, on the part of the plaintiff; 4. By default of either party in the course of legal proceedings, as in the case of judgment by nihil disit or non sum informatus, when the defendant has omitted to plead or instruct his attorney to do so after a proper notice or in cases of judgment by non pros; or as in case of nonsuit, when the plaintiff omits to follow up his proceedings.

    These four species of judgments, again, are either interlocutory or final.

    A list of various types of judgments follows:

    JUDGMENT IN ASSUMPSIT is either in favor of the plaintiff or defendant; when in favor of the plaintiff, it is that he recover a specified sum, assessed by a jury or on reference to the prothonotary or other proper officer, for the damages which he has sustained, by reason of the defendant’s non-performance of his promises and undertakings and for full costs of suit. When the judgment is for the defendant, it is that he recover his costs.

    JUDGMENT IN ACTIONS ON THE CASE FOR TORTS, when for the plaintiff, is that he recover a sum of money ascertained by a jury for his damages occasioned by the committing of the grievances complained of and the costs of suit. When for the defendant, it is for costs.

    Judgment OF CASSETUR BREVE or BILLA, is in cases of pleas in abatement where the plaintiff prays that his ‘writ’ or ‘ bill’ ‘may be quashed, that he may sue or exhibit a better one.’

    JUDGMENT BY CONFESSION. When instead of entering a plea, the defendant chooses to confess the action; or, after pleading; he does, at any time before trial, both confess the action and withdraw his plea or other allegations; the judgment against him, in these two cases, is called a judgment by confession or by confession relicta verificatione.

    CONTRADICTORY JUDGMENT. By this term is understood, in the state of Louisiana, a judgment which has been given after the parties have been heard, either in support of their claims or in their defence. A judgment is called contradictory to distinguish it from one which is rendered by default.

    JUDGMENT IN COVENANT; when for the plaintiff, is that he recover an ascertained sum for his damages, which he has sustained by reason of the breach or breaches of the defendant’s covenant, together with costs of suit. When for the defendant, the judgment, is for costs.

    JUDGMENT IN THE ACTION OF DEBT; when for the plaintiff, is that he recover his debt and in general, nominal damages for the detention thereof. In some penal and other particular actions the plaintiff does not, however, always recover costs. When the judgment is for the defendant, it is generally for costs. In some penal actions, however, neither party can recover costs.

    JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT, is a judgment rendered in consequence of tho non-appearance of the defendant and is either by nil dicit or by non sum informatus. This judgment is interlocutory in assumpsit, covenant, trespass, case and replevin, where the sole object of the action is damages; but in debt, damages not being the principal object of the action, the plaintiff usually signs final judgment in the first instance.

    JUDGMENT IN THE ACTION OF DETINUE; when for the plaintiff, is in the alternative, that he recover the goods or the value thereof, if he cannot have the goods themselves and his damage for the detention and costs.

    JUDGMENT IN ERROR, is a judgment rendered by a court ot error, on a record sent up, from an inferior court. These judgments are of two kinds, of affirmance and reversal. When the judgment is for the defendant in error, whether the errors assigned be in law or in fact, it is ‘that the former judgment be affirmed and stand in full force and effect, the said causes and matters assigned for error notwithstanding and that the defendant in error recover $____ for his damages, charges and costs which he hath sustained,’ etc. When it is for the plaintiff in error, the judgment is that it be reversed or recalled. It is to be reversed for error in law, in this form, that it be reversed, annulled and altogether holden for nought.’ For error in fact the judgment is recalled, revocatur.

    A FINAL JUDGMENT is one which puts an end to the suit. When the issue is one in fact and is tried by a jury, the jury at the time that they try the issue, assess the damages and the judgment is final in the first instance and is that the plaintiff do recover the damages assessed.

    When an interlocutory judgment has been rendered and a writ of inquiry has issued to ascertain the damages, on the return of the inquisition the plaintiff is entitled to a final judgment, namely, that he recover the amount of damages so assessed.

    AN INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT is one given in the course of a cause, before final judgment. When the action sounds in damages and the issue is an issue in law or when any issue in fact not tried by a jury is decided in favor of the plaintiff, then the judgment is that the plaintiff ought to recover his damages without specifying their amount; for, as there has been no trial by jury in the case, the amount of damages is not yet ascertained. The judgment is then said to be interlocutory. To ascertain such damages it is the practice to issue a writ of inquiry. When the action is founded on a promissory note, bond or other writing or any other contract by which the amount due may be readily computed, the practice is, in some courts, to refer it to the prothonotary or clerk to assess the damages. There is one species of interlocutory judgment which establishes nothing but the inadequacy of the defence set up this is the judgment for the plaintiff on demurrer to a plea in abatement, by which it appears that the defendant has mistaken the law on a point which does not affect the merits of his case; and it being but reasonable that he should offer, if he can, a further defence, that judgment is that he do answer over, in technical language, judgment of respondeat ouster.

    JUDGMENT OF NIL CAPIAT PER BREVE or PER BILLAM. When an issue arises upon a declaration or peremptory plea and it is decided in favor of the defendant, the judgment is, in general, that, the plaintiff take nothing by his writ, (or bill,) and that the defendant go thereof without day, etc. This is called a judgment of nil capiat per breve or per billam.

    JUDGMENT BY NIL DICIT, is one rendered against a defendant for want of a plea. The plaintiff obtains a rule on the defendant to plead within a time specified, of which he serves a notice on the defendant or his attorney; if the defendant neglect to enter a plea within the time specified, the plaintiff may sign judgment against him.

    JUDGMENT OF NOLLE PROSEQUI, is a judgment entered against the plaintiff, where, after appearance and before judgment, he says, ‘he will not further prosecute his suit.’

    JUDGMENT OF NON OBSTANTE VEREDICTO, is a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff, without regard to the verdict obtained by the defendant. The motion for such judgment is made where after a pleading by the defendant in confession and avoidance, as for example, a plea in bar and issue joined thereon and verdict found for, the defendant, the plaintiff on retrospective examination of the record, conceives that such plea was bad in substance and might have been made the subject of demurrer on that ground. If the plea was itself substantially bad in law, of course the verdict, which merely shows it to be true in point of fact, cannot avail to entitle the defendant to judgment; while on the other hand the plea being in confession and avoidance, involves a confession of the plaintiff’s declaration and shows that he was entitled. to maintain his action. In such case, therefore, this court will give judgment for the plaintiff, without regard to the verdict; and this, for the reasons above explained, is called a judgment upon confession. Sometimes it may be expedient for the plaintiff to move for judgment non obstante, etc., even though the verdict be in his own favor; for, if in such case as above described, he takes judgment as upon the verdict, it seems that such judgment would be erroneous and that the only safe course is to take it as upon confession.

    JUDGMENT BY NON SUM INFORMATUS, is one which is rendered, when instead of entering a plea, the defendant’s attorney says he is not informed of any answer to be given to the action. .

    JUDGMENT OF NON PROS. (from non prosequitur,) is one given against the plaintiff, in any class of actions, for not declaring or replying or surrejoining, etc. or for not entering the issue.

    JUDGMENT OF NONSUIT, Practice, is one against the plaintiff, which happens when, on trial by jury, the plaintiff, on being called or demanded, at the instance of the defendant, to be present while the jury give their verdict, fails to make his appearance. In this case, no verdict is given, but the judgment of nonsuit passes against the plaintiff. So if, after issue be joined, the plaintiff neglect to bring such issue on to be tried in due time, as limited by the practice of the court, in the particular case, judgment will be also given against him for this default; and it is called judgment as in case of nonsuit. After suffering a nonsuit, the plaintiff may commence another action for the same cause for which the first had been instituted. In some cases, plaintiffs having obtained information in what manner the jury had agreed upon their verdict before it was delivered in court, have, when the jury were ready to give in such verdict against them, suffered a nonsuit for the purpose of commencing another action and obtaining another trial. To prevent this abuse, the legislature of Pennsylvania have provided, by the Act of March 28, 1814, 6:Reed’s L. 208, that ‘whenever on the trial of any cause, the jury shall be ready to give in their verdict, the plaintiff shall not be called, nor shall he then be permitted to suffer a nonsuit.’

    JUDGMENT QUOD COMPUTET. The name of an interlocutory judgment in an action of account render that the defendant do account, quod computet.

    JUDGMENT QUOD RECUPERET. When an issue in law, other than one arising on a dilatory plea or an issue in fact, is decided in favor of the plaintiff, the judgment is, that the plaintiff do recover, which is called a judgment guod recuperet. This judgment is of two kinds, namely, interlocutory or final.

    JUDGMENT IN REPLEVIN, is either for the plaintiff or defendant.

    For The Plaintiff. 1. When the declaration is in the detinuit, that is, where the plaintiff declares, that the chattels ‘were detained until replevied by the sheriff,’ the judgment is that he recover the damages assessed by the jury for the taking and unjust detention or for the latter only, where the former was justifiable, as also his costs. If the replevin is in the detinet, that is, where the plaintiff declares that the chattels taken are ‘yet detained,’ the jury must find, ‘in addition to the above, the value of the chattels, (assuming that they are still detained,) not in a gross sum, but each separate article; for tho defendant, perhaps, will restore some, in which case the plaintiff is to recover the value of the remainder.

    For The Defendant. 1. If the replevin be abated, the judgment is, that the writ or plaint abate and that the defendant (having avowed) have a return of the chattels. When the plaintiff is nonsuited, the judgment for the defendant, at common law, is, that the chattels be restored to him and this without his first assigning the purpose for which they were taken, because, by abandoning his suit, the plaintiff admits that he had no right to dispossess the defendant by prosecuting the replevin. The form of this judgment. is simply ‘to have a return,’ without adding the words ‘to hold irreplevisable.’ When tho avowant succeeds upon the merits of his case, the common law judgment is, that he ‘have return irreplevisable,’ for it is apparent that he is by law entitled to keep possession of the goods.

    JUDGMENT OF RESPONDEAT OUSTER. When there is an issue in law, arising on a dilatory plea and it is decided in favor of the plaintiff, the judgment is only that the defendant answer over, which is called a judgment of respondeat ouster. The pleading is accordingly resumed and the action proceeds.

    JUDGMENT OF RETRAXIT, is one where, after appearance and before judgment, the, plaintiff enters upon the record that he ‘withdraws his suit;’ in such case judgment is given against him.

    JUDGMENT IN AN ACTION ON TRESPASS, when for the plaintiff, is that he recover the damages assessed by the jury and the costs. For the defendant, that he recover the costs.

    JUDGMENT IN ACTION ON THE CASE FOR TROVER, when for the plaintiff, is, that he recover damages and costs. For the defendant, the judgment is, that he recover his costs.

    JUDGMENT OF CAPIATUR. At common law, on conviction, in a civil action, of a forcible wrong, alleged to have been committed vi et armis, etc., the defendant was obliged to pay a fine to the king, for the breach of the peace implied in the act and a judgment of capiatur pro fine was rendered against him, under which he was liable to be arrested and imprisoned till the fine was paid. But the judgment of capiatur pro fine was abolished.

    JUDGMENT OF MISERICORDIA. At common law, the party to, a suit who did not prevail was punished for his unjust vexation and therefore judgment was given against him, quod sit in misericordia pro falso clamore. Hence, when the plaintiff sued out a writ, the sheriff was obliged to take pledges of prosecution before he returned it, which when fines and amercements were considerable, were real and responsible persons and answerable for those amercements; but now they are never levied and the pledges are merely formal, namely, John Doe and Richard Roe.

    JUDGMENT QUOD PARTITIO FIAT is a judgment in a writ of partition, that partition be made; this is not a final judgment. The final judgment is, quod partitio facta firma et stabilis in perpetuum teneatur.

    JUDGMENT QUOD PARTES REPLACITENT. The name of a judgment given when the court award a repleader. When issue is joined on an immaterial point or a point on which the court cannot give a judgment determining the right, they award a repleader or judgment quod partes replacitent.

    Private Attorney General

  48. Terri says:

    To find tons of CAFR information, please visit Walter Burien’s website.

  49. Terri says:

    The Bankruptcy Scam of 1933 – This is Part 1 – There are 14 parts. If you’ll go to the page of the person who uploaded it (BoKnowsEntertainment), you can get all of them.

  50. Terri says:

    Rod sent me a long email regarding Fake Gold in Fort Knox. If anyone wants to see it, just send me an email at rodclassteam@gmail.com and I’ll forward it to you. It has too many hyperlinks and would take forever to post it here.

  51. Terri says:

    POSTED: April 1, 12:23 PM ET | By Matt Taibbi
    Barack Obama recently issued an executive order imposing a wave of sanctions against Libya, not only freezing Libyan assets, but barring Americans from having business dealings with Libyan banks.

    So raise your hand if you knew that the United States has been extending billions of dollars in aid to Qaddafi and to the Central Bank of Libya, through a Libyan-owned subsidiary bank operating out of Bahrain. And raise your hand if you knew that, just a week or so after Obama’s executive order, the U.S. Treasury Department quietly issued an order exempting this and other Libyan-owned banks to continue operating without sanction.

    I came across the curious case of the Arab Banking Corporation, better known as ABC, while researching a story about the results of the audit of the Federal Reserve. That story, which will be coming out in Rolling Stone in two weeks, will examine in detail some of the many lunacies uncovered by Senate investigators amid the recently-released list of bailout and emergency aid recipients – a list that includes many extremely shocking names, from foreign industrial competitors to hedge funds in tax-haven nations to various Wall Street figures of note (and some of their relatives). You will want to see this amazing list when it comes out, so please make sure to check the newsstands in two weeks’ time.

    This list became public as a result of an amendment added to the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill that was sponsored by Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont. The amendment forced the Federal Reserve to open its books for the first time and make public the names of those individuals and corporations who received emergency loans and bailout monies during the roughly two year period between the crash of 2008 and the passage of the Dodd-Frank bill.

    As Bernie’s staff was going through this list, it found, among other things, some $26 billion in extremely cheap loans (as low as one quarter of one percent!) extended to this ABC bank over a period of years, beginning in December of 2007 and continuing through as recently as February of 2010. The senator sent a letter to Ben Bernanke over the winter demanding more information about this loan (among others) but the response he got was completely unhelpful.

    When I first started working on this story, one of Sanders’s aides was careful to point out the ABC loans. Later, I took a closer look at the company and found that it was 59% owned by the Central Bank of Libya, which I found very odd, even by the generally insane standards of the bailout era. Why, I wondered, would the Federal Reserve be giving Muammar Qaddafi $26 billion in near-zero interest loans? Exactly how does that address America’s financial problems? What bailout plan could that possibly be part of?

    It gets weirder from there. Sanders’s office subsequently found out that ABC is not only exempt from Obama’s sanctions, it has two functioning branches here in New York City. In a letter he sent yesterday evening to Ben Bernanke, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency chief John Walsh (the banking regulator with purview over the New York branches), Sanders put it this way:

    Why would the U.S. government allow a bank that is predominantly owned by the Central Bank of Libya – an institution on which the U.S. has imposed strict economic sanctions – to operate two banking branches within our own borders?

    Neither the Fed nor Treasury so far has offered explanations for these loans; the Treasury has so far only explained why ABC was not subject to sanctions and pointed to the March 4th order when I contacted them.

    The ABC loans are just one example of the Fed’s bailout madness. Again, there are 21,000 transactions on the Fed’s list of released names, and “every one of these… is outrageous,” as one Sanders aide put it. You will be shocked, for sure, to find out who else is on that list. We’ll have a lot more on those other loans in the next issue of Rolling Stone

  52. Terri says:

    World Affairs Brief – April 1, 2011

    US Kept in the Dark as Obama Preps for Larger War
    Who is the Libyan Opposition?
    Obama’s Big Lie: No Troops
    Syria is Next
    Grand Juries a Tool of Prosecution
    Why a Global Currency is not Imminent
    Why Inflation Hurts More Nowadays
    Japan Nuclear Situation


  53. Terri says:

    From Carl
    NEW AIB Lobbying Office in Process

    Ladies and Gentlemen:

    Yesterday I had a small “win” in the battle. Mr. Raja and I met with John Brodtke who works with Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur. He gave us about an hour and fifteen minutes of his time. Currently, they have a bill being prepared for the floor of the House stating that all mortgage foreclosures will “show the note” from now on. We were able to show John that the bill is most likely useless since the foreclosure mills use such companies as DocX and LPS to re-create lost notes, that these companies are doing this now, and that her bill is a nice idea but the slime balls get around it more easily than anyone knows. I would like to thank Mr. Raja very much for being there since the guy we spoke to has a good handle on securities and Mr Raja could handle himself far better than I can at this time in that arena.

    We went into securitization which John understood to some degree, but did not understand that the banks sell ‘copies’ of these notes – counterfeit basically. He had a hard time fathoming that Raja’s own note created $93,000,000 at first, but after Raja explained things, he got the picture. We got into the fact that the counties are being totally screwed by not receiving the transfer taxes upon re-assignment of the note. I told him that if Congresswoman Kaptur could get a handle on this, then there would be NO WORRIES any longer about counties running out of money. We explained a little about CFR and Unifund and CRIS accounts – he could not believe judges/attorneys buy into these things.

    (Last night I listened to the Congress channel on cable….what a load of bullshit they talked about – they are more worried about keeping the government going than anything else.)

    The meeting ended with John wishing to see us again in a few weeks – end of April he said. I asked him if we could have a couple hours with the Congresswoman herself in order that Raja, Rod, and Carl can be heard. He said he will try. He seemed quite interested in the issues and did say this – “NEXT TIME you come back, have actual solutions that can be implemented.” He told us that he is OK with hearing the problems, but give him solutions that he can provide to the Congresswoman as well. In other words, do all his work for him. That is fine.

    My thought is this: Have a small office, for example, at my own Fairfax County government center and hire Mr. Raja and Martin to work there and do forensic audits on mortgages at random in the Land Records Department. This will be a commission basis job. If Raja cannot find improprieties in the chain of title (time to laugh here) then no action needs to be taken, but if he finds problems like my own case has – about 8 title changes which represent a loss of revenue to the county of 8 transfers, then he levies the bank for the monies due, penalties, interest, etc. In my own case alone, the transfer was done about 8 times, which represents 1% of ($1,265,000) = $12,650 per transfer tax. That equates to 8 times $12,650 which for my note alone comes to: $101,200 of taxes lost to Fairfax County alone. Let’s assume there are a couple thousand home sales per year in the county, then assume each new note is traded only a few times amongst the banks. It is logical to assume my own county has been cheated out of many millions of dollars each and every year because of this scheme run by the banks. So basically the county loses nothing at all if Raja and Martin did these investigations as a pilot program and find nothing to complain about, but we all know what will be discovered. (I am only volunteering Mr. Raja and Martin as examples here – maybe Carl would like to move to DC and have some fun with these guys!)

    Now, extrapolate to a foreclosure situation in which the bank has already traded that note many times over, and now some sucker comes along and signs a new note for that same property……..well, a whole new set of sales/trades is now created. The county once again gets screwed out of MORE taxes due with this new note. This is the approach I am going to use with the local county supervisor. Her name is Linda Smyth…..(unfortunately she is very busy handling the exploitation of bunny rabbits and other rodents that are being abused in the county- this is supposed to be funny, but on second thought is likely correct!) Anyway, when I get through to the Honorable Supervisor, I will pitch this as a business approach.

    The SEC called me yesterday and I relayed this to Raja – they want to hear his side of the story based ONLY on SEC violations. They do not care about the fraud committed anywhere else – they are quite single minded. This person will then send the case forward to a full investigation if Raja can convince him that there is something that needs to be looked at more closely. Mr Raja will call their investigator on Monday – his name is Bob Green – phone 202-551-6331 to explain what he has uncovered. I did not get into the problem too much because it seems more logical to use the experts like Raja, Rod, and Carl.

    Over the next few weeks I will continue to seek appointments downtown, and also in my own county. Raja is totally available anytime, so we think if we can start with Congresswoman Kaptur for an audience, we might get Rod and Carl here. No offense to Bobbie and her gender, but my own spin on this is that I will remind the Congresswoman of her minority status, and that this might be a good way to get a seat in the Senate one day and give her the political clout that it takes to overcome these old men farts that sit there now.

    That’s it for the week, thanks for listening, just want to keep us all in the loop on how things are progressing. Jeff

    Jeffrey L Brown

    Note: Contact CW for replies:
    CW (Carl)

  54. Terri says:

    A Female Lawyer Exclaims: “You mean that ALL I was taught (in law school) is WRONG ?”

    A very revealing audio on one female lawyer’s revelation as to the “fraud” that she is supporting and pushing forward. “You mean that all I was taught (in law school) is wrong ?” You bet, sister ! The rabbit hole goes so deep that you won’t believe it ! This is an audio from Rod Class on the AIB Friday night call of 4.1.11 (unfortunate that it happened on April Fool’s Day, but what can ya do ?). However, if YOU listen to this audio a couple of times you will have more insight into the “fraud” that our WHOLE economic system is based on !

    If YOU are a lawyer, or know a lawyer, you might want to listen to this audio…

    [audio src="http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-48361/TS-471751.mp3" /]

    For more revealing audios (404 in total)…check the archives at

    Work your way back from the most current…


  55. Terri says:

    Criminal Judges To Be Prosecuted? Video

    Segment #1
    Why Disqualified Judges Orders Are Null & Void

    Segment #2
    Senate Bill SBX2 11 Does Not Protect Judges From Criminal Prosecution

    Segment #3
    Lawyers, Judges & Malpractice Insurance To Cover Court Crimes?

  56. Terri says:

    Video from Judicial Watch
    Politics and the Holder Justice Department: Rule of Law at Risk?

  57. Terri In NC says:

    Stop Dept Collector Doc


  58. Terri In NC says:


  59. Terri In NC says:

    From Carl 04/11/2011

    To the legislators I know on Judiciary:

    This letter was sent to the Judiciary Chairs Hastings and Nass. I am not sure if it was shared with the rest of the committee so am sending it along for your review.

    Bobbi Beavers

    Representative Roberta B Beavers
    District 148, serving the people of Eliot and South Berwick (part)
    Joint Standing Committee on Energy, Utilities and Technology
    State of Maine 125th Legislature

    Here is a letter that I obtained yesterday from a former partner of mine who used to teach UCC law at the UMaine Law School.
    Petruccelli Letter to Senator Hastings and Representative Nass 04082011

  60. Terri In NC says:

    From Carl 04/11/2011

    Iceland Rejects Bankster Shakedown

  61. Terri In NC says:

    From Carl 04/11/2011
    AIB Lobbying Update

    Hello John,

    Thank you once again for meeting with me and Mr. Raja on the first of April. We were very pleased that you took the time to listen to our evidence that we have accumulated in regard to bank fraud, and glad that you understood the problems out there.

    At the end of our meeting you expressed interest in having us return in a few weeks down the road. I would like to plan accordingly for that time and bring in Mr. Rod Class of North Carolina who is extremely knowledgeable in the law and Constitutional matters. He will very much impress you I am sure!

    We could meet with you sometime toward the end of the month as you originally suggested. How about the week of April 25th? I would really like to meet the Congresswoman at that time if you can arrange this. I do understand her schedule is busy, but what we are offering to her is information that will expose a multi billion dollar fraud against this country (perhaps even a multi trillion dollar fraud might be more appropriate). Our group will conclusively show the Congresswoman how foreign banks have been funnelling money out of this country thus directing our once great nation into becoming a third world entity.

    We have solutions to the problems as well – you asked us not to show up with just the problem, but to provide the answers as well. Our group has thought extensively and will provide solid solutions on how to recuperate what has been stolen. We are currently preparing to meet with the FBI on these same matters and would be honored to have Congresswoman Kaptur spearhead these discussions once she sees the depth to which the civil theft has permeated our entire economy. Remember what we said that day – THERE IS NO SHORTAGE OF FUNDS – the funds have simply been stolen from the people.

    We would also be quite honored if the Congresswoman would like to spearhead our approaches to the IRS as well. Remember what I told you about my own county – Fairfax County here in Virginia? We have been robbed of millions of dollars in tax payments as these banks have arranged to avoid recording transfers of title here in the Land Records department – and I can prove this. This is called TAX EVASION !

    I am personally asking the Congresswoman to take the time to listen to her constituents – WE THE PEOPLE – and learn enough about this massive fraud and conspiracy which will no doubt destroy this country if left unchecked. Please take the time to make her listen to what we have shown you and provide us with the time to see her in a few weeks from now.

    Many thanks, Jeff Brown and friends

  62. Terri In NC says:

    Bankruptcy Judge Margaret M. Mann GETS IT!
    By Daniel Edstrom
    DTC Systems, Inc.

    Coming off of the heels of in re: Agard (http://dtc-systems.net/2011/02/mers-agency-york-bankruptcy-court-agard/), the Honorable Judge Mann from the United States Bankruptcy Court Southern District of California took 76 days to review the Motion for Relief From Automatic Stay for the in re: Salazar Chapter 13 bankruptcy (Bankruptcy No: 10-17456-MM13). The findings of fact and conclusions of law were an amazing reading that confirms many of the issues we have been discussing in regards to loans, securitization and foreclosure. Like Judge Grossman in the agard case, Judge Mann goes to great lengths to research the details that are applicable to this case. Here are some highlights:

    Assignments must be recorded before the foreclosure sale
    Civil Code Section 2932.5 applies to Deeds of Trust
    Recorded assignments are necessary despite MERS’ role
    The Gomes case does not apply [to the Salazar case]
    US Bank or MERS cannot contract away their obligations to comply with the foreclosure statutes
    As a matter of law, Salazar’s acknowledgment cannot be read as a waiver of his right to be informed of a change in beneficiary status.
    MERS System is not an alternative to statutory foreclosure law
    US Bank as the foreclosing assignee was obligated to record its interest before the sale despite MERS’ initial role under the DOT, and this role cannot be used to bypass Civil Code section 2932.5. Since US Bank failed to record its interest, Salazar has a valid property interest in his residence that is entitled to protection through the automatic stay
    Cause does not exist to grant relief from stay
    Denying relief from stay at this time is the least prejudicial option for both parties

    Much more is in this memorandum decision. The memorandum decision is available here:

  63. Terri In NC says:

    How did your Court Criss Account Stock do today?

    *Court Registry Investment System*

    Back in 1990, Federal judges and clerks down in South Texas got to thinking “Damn, with all the fees lying around, shouldn’t we invest it and make some money off it?” Pretty soon, they cooked up the Court Registry Investment System (CRIS), on the recommendation of financial analyst (now Clerk) Mike Milby, and with permission of the U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve Board of Governors. The pooled funds never actually leave the US Treasury account in the Texas Commerce Bank of Houston because the Bank invests them in US
    Treasury Bills through CRIS investment managers at JP Morgan. Thus all 25 member US Court Districts always have funds available to disburse for their various purposes.

    Not only does the court have several billion dollars in the pool and over a billion dollars invested at any one time, but also it earns upwards of a million dollars a month in interest alone. And it charges a registry fee of upwards of 10% for managing the investment (rather than taking the fees out of earnings). Member District Courts share proportionately in CRIS earnings.

    See the US COURTS press release on CRIS
    see Google links here.

    I have attached a RAR archive containing documents. If you cannot open it, get and use WinRAR or Jzip or 7zip.

    See the 1990 documents (attached) establishing CRIS in the South Texas USDC below. 25 Districts share it:

    Amended Order Establishing the Court Registry Investment System (CRIS) -Term Fund
    View PDF

    Memorandum of Procedures for Investment and Allocating Earnings on Assets of the United States District Court
    View PDF

    Order Establishing the Court Registry Investment System (CRIS) – Term Fund
    View PDF

    Order for Assessment of a Management Fee on Funds Placed in the Court Registry
    View PDF

    The order establishing CRIS says this:

    Registry deposits with known disbursement horizons exceeding 100 days require an investment strategy of purchasing longer term U. S. Treasury Securities. The CRIS-Term Fund meets this need. The objectives of the CRIS-Term Fund in order of importance are: 1) to assure the safety of Registry Funds; 2) to maintain sufficient quarterly liquidity to provide adequate and timely disbursement
    of funds as directed by the court, and 3) to achieve the highest rate of return consistent with objectives 1 and 2. The Clerk, U. S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas is ORDERED to establish the CRIS-Term Fund. The initial CRIS-Term Fund investments shall be
    one year U. S. Treasury Securities or multiple U. S. Treasury securities, which have an average maturity and an average yield approximately equal to one year U.S. Treasury Securities. The CRIS-Term Fund shall provide a minimum of quarterly liquidity, unless a special order of disbursement from a participating court is entered.
    Subsequent investments shall meet the CRIS-Term Fund objectives and shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, that persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence would exercise in the management of their own affairs. DONE at Houston, Texas, on this the day of December, 1990.
    United States District Court

    The amended order above says this (interesting)

    On December 27, 1990, a General Order was entered under Number 90-46 establish @ Registry investment System (CRIS)-Term Fund which is companion to the existing CRIS Liquidity Fund. This Fund is egtablished to meet the unique requirements of the Court Of the Southern District of New York to invest, manage and disburse large sums on deposit in 88 Civ 6209 (S/D NY) styled Securities and Exchange Commission vs. Drexel, Burnham, Lambert; et al- Upon the request of Michael R. Milken and the presiding judge of the Court of the Southern District of New York, Order No. 90-46 is amended to include the following language; it is hereby ORDERED that the funds and their investments on deposit in the CRIS shall, under the supervision of the Court of the Southern District of New York, be
    available solely for utilization pursuant to, and in furtherance of the purposes described in, the Final Judgment of permanent injunction and other relief as to Michael R. Milken, in said Court.
    DONE at Houston, Texas, on this the 29th day of December, 1990.

    The order assessing a registry management fee of 10% says this:

    Under the notice in the October 24, 1990 edition of the Federal Register,
    Vol. 55, No. 206, at Page 42887.
    It is ORDERED that the Clerk assess the registry management fee at a rate equal to ten percent (10%) of the total earnings for funds deposited on or after December 1, 1990. The fee shall be assessed each time earnings are allocated to the Court’s registry of pooled accounts and other interest bearing accounts, beginning December 1, 1990 and continuing while the funds are held in the Court’s registry. The fee will be assessed for all funds invested regardless of the nature of the case underlying the investment. The Clerk shall assess a fee equivalent to the first 45 days earnings or one-eight percent of earnings on an annual basis for funds deposited prior to December 1, 1990.
    ADOPTED by the Full Court this day of 1990.

    Case Monetization-CRIS_Report-07-2003-b.pdf(also
    attached hereto)

    The above-linked document shows how federal courts earn interest on the money they receive in fees, fines, etc. Basically they invest the money, presumably on petition from the payor, through the South Texas USDC CRIS.

    Procedures begin on page 36.

    Pages 44 through 59 provide flow charts showing how CRIS administers the money through JP Morgan (which gets a nice fee for the service).

    Page 64 contains the excerpt from the Federal Register

    Pages 65 and 66 give the CRIS investment pool summary for 2006

    If you have a more recent report, send it to me. And now, some questions:

    Do you suppose the investment managers securitized the investment fund?

    Shouldn’t the investment fund reduce the amount of fees the people must pay for court services, transcripts, PACER, and so on?

    When you pay fines or fees, should you designate them to go into CRIS investment?

    If you do designate them for CRIS, will YOU receive the earnings?

    Should you write to your legislators about this?

  64. Terri In NC says:

    From Carl 04/13/2011
    Right to Travel cases

    LYNCH v. – FindLaw | Cases and Codes

    U.S. Supreme Court. LYNCH v. HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORP., 405 U.S. 538 (1972). 405 U.S. 538. LYNCH ET AL. v. HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORP. ET AL. …

    LYNCH V. HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORP., 405 U. S. 538 :: Volume 405 …

    The drivers license is used as an internal passport, see

    The Right to Travel – US Supreme Court Cases from Justia & Oyez

    1864 The constitutional right to travel has long been recognized,1865 but it …. to travel principle upon the distribution scheme, but the Court’s decision …

    Things That Are Not In the U.S. Constitution – The U.S.

    18 Dec 2010 … However, Supreme Court decisions over the years have established that … The Right To Travel. As the Supreme Court notes in Saenz v Roe, …


    CASE #3: “The right to travel is a part of the liberty of which the citizen cannot … We could go on, quoting court decision after court decision; however, …

    Your Drivers License is a Contract.

    This case isolates “right to travel” defense only… The court only …. the court quoted from a 1958 decision involving his fathers challenge to the …

    FindLaw: U.S. Constitution: Fourteenth Amendment: Annotations pg …

    4 The constitutional right to travel has long been recognized, … the right to travel principle upon the distribution scheme, but the Court’s decision went …

    Privileges or Immunities Clause – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    In the Slaughter-House Cases the court recognized two types of citizenship. …. The right to travel from one state to another was already protected by the …


    26 Jan 2006 … that Defendants violated his right to travel, given that other forms of travel remain possible. This circuit’s decision in Miller v. …

    Fundamental Rights and Equal Protection Clause Analysis: The Right …

    It will NOT be enough, the Court said in its 5 to 4 decision, that a right … the right to a free transcript in a criminal appeal, the right to travel from …

    Equal protection | LII / Legal Information Institute

    19 Aug 2010… rights such as first amendment rights, the right to privacy, or the right to travel. … The right, guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. … N.Y. Court of Appeals: Recent Decisions on Equal Protection …

    Kent v. Dulles

    Fully Informed Jury Association

  65. Terri In NC says:

    More validation for PAGs

    More validation for PAGs…Found at…and there are hyperlinks within the quote at the link which also has other cites…

    “In rejecting a significantly different focus under RICO, therefore, we are honoring an analogy that Congress itself accepted and relied upon, and one that promotes the objectives of civil RICO as readily as it furthers the objects of the Clayton Act. Both statutes share a common congressional objective of encouraging civil litigation to supplement Government efforts to deter and penalize the respectively prohibited practices. The object of civil RICO is thus not merely to compensate victims but to turn them into prosecutors, “private attorneys general,” dedicated to eliminating racketeering activity. 3 Id., at 187 (citing Malley-Duff, 483 U.S., at 151 ) (civil RICO specifically has a “further purpose [of] encouraging potential private plaintiffs diligently to investigate”). The provision for treble damages is accordingly justified by the expected benefit of suppressing racketeering activity, an object pursued the sooner the better.”
    [Rotella v. Wood et al., 528 U.S. 549 (2000)]
    [bold emphasis added]

  66. Terri In NC says:

    Subject: HAARP Event-May 16-19 (fwd)

    I reviewed this email and looked at a few videos and web sites. The coincidence that FEMA and military operations were being implemented before, and during earthquakes of the past is quite phenomenal. Chances of this happening are slim to none in the betting world; however it being coincidental or not… it is not for me to decide whether you know of this or not, therefore, I am forwarding to you these links for you to decide yourself.

    I firmly believe in the people as whole being intelligent enough to investigate and learn of things that may be harmful to themselves and families. It is NOT the right of any form of government, to cover up potential health, safety and harmful problems, as they have done in the past so many times before and are doing so today as you read this article. Their belief is that the people can not handle the truth. I say that is a bunch of Bull and we the people must always know and learn of all things that pertain to our health, wealth, life and liberties!

    It is my DUTY to let you know of possible crimes being committed against the people of the United States and the world, as a Christian and as a Patriot for free agency, liberties and freedoms that God has given us, in this life.

    So, without further explanation, please review the following and chose for yourself… Truth or fiction?

    David J. D’Addabbo Dabodave1@pdqx.net Investigator for the people.

    Let me know what you think… if enough people talk about this, perhaps we can expose the truths… David…
    Those that implement these events-to Gitmo TOPOFF to FINISH DHS | National Exercise Program FEMA: National Level Exercise 2011 (NLE 2011) 28 Jan 2011 … NLE 2011 is designated as a Tier I National Level Exercise. Tier I exercises (formerly known as the Top Officials exercise series or TOPOFF)

    Ready.gov: National Level Exercise 2011 The Great Central U.S. Shakeout in April 2011 will involve more than 1 million people through a broad-based outreach program, partnership with the media,

    YouTube – FEMA NLE 2011 May Be Ready to Blow the New Madrid Fault ! 6 Jan 2011
    http://www.shakeout.org/downloads/nle_factsheet.pdf http://mae.cee.uiuc.edu/news /FEMANLE.html
    Representative from the Federal Emergency

    YouTube – Army Corps of Engineers – NLE 2011 – illinois plan – NO … http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zi0iffzTQwc

    National Level Exercise 2011 (NLE 2011) Private Sector Participation http://www.asisonline.org/documents/NLE_2011_FACT_SHEET_PS_Participation.pdf

    IDHS: Earthquake Preparedness Program / NLE 2011

    Depopulation as the ultimate purpose of global radiation war

    Scientist: U.S., Canada, Mexico, Hawaii targeted in nuclear war from Japan

    The west coasts of the United States and Canada, and Mexico, Ms. Moret indicates, are the major food producing areas for North America. Radiation from the Japan quake/nuclear meltdown events at Fukushima is intentionally being steered into these areas in order to dose the land and the food with radiation.

    The specific agencies in nation-states carrying out these tectonic attacks and radiation programs do so as part of Agenda 21, a depopulation program enunciated when Henry Kissinger was U.S. Secretary of State, and a deep cover operative of this war crimes racketeering organization.

    European Parliament Indicates US Caused Jap Quake with HAARP!

    NOTE! The next quake will be the New Madrid between May 16-19 2011! PBS, History channel and others are already ‘conditioning’ you to believe this will be a ‘NATURAL’ event. The mere FACT that it WILL OCCUR between this time frame when troops are pre-positioned will prove it to be a STAGED EVENT! These troops will likely be CANADIAN as the CIA is now training Canadian officers in Ft. Leavenworth TX NOW for this event. SHOOT THEM or any Americans willing to force you off your property and into waiting FEMA relocation camps. If you want to live in a tent on what’s left of YOUR property, that is your RIGHT! This is being done to intentionally cull the heard and takeover this nation. So respond accordingly!

    While I like MOST of what Ryan Dawson puts out regarding IsraHELL and other material. He is completely IGNORANT of what HAARP can do and has done. One only need look at this graph from March 9 here: For over 2 DAYS HAARP was screaming out this signal calling for the quake to hit Japan.
    You can adjust the date to see this cease AFTER the quake occurred. This is not inconsistent with what the globalists want. Namely DEPOPULATION! They don’t care about the economic situation as their plan has always been to CRA$H the system to force a cashless society. They don’t care about radiation or food as they are stocked up in their underground bunkers. If you are wondering who Ryan Dawson is or why I even mention him, see this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEJj3FQWN38
    No, the WTC was NOT taken down by micro-nukes but by super nano thermite and explosive controlled demolition. But Japan WAS attacked by HAARP technology and even the European Parliment has now SAID SO and are asking questions they will NEVER get answers to. HAARP is a military WEAPON and controlled by the military. The one in Alaska is controlled by the Air Force. NOTE below that they liked what HAARP can do so well they built an improved MOBILE version!

    European Parliament Questions HAARP
    European Parliament issues warnings on HAARP

    HAARP Magnetometer Data Shows HAARP Caused Japan Earthquake

    Mobile HAARP Boat caused Japan Quake!!
    WHY doe this exist? WHY is it controlled by the military? WHY was it over by Japan sending that signal for 2 days??

    HAARP Magnetometer data shows Japan earthquake was induced.
    A look at the induction magnetometer charts from last year’s earthquake in Haiti as well as from the recent earthquake measuring 9.1 on the Richter scale that triggered a tsunami and destruction on the Japanese east coast show surprising similarities that point to an artificial cause and the use of HAARP technology. In the case of Haiti, low frequency signals of 2,1 Hz were detected for 40 hours before the earthquake occurred while in the case of Japan something similar happened. Low frequency signals of 2,5 Hz were detected for about 55 hours before the earthquake occurred off the coast of Japan as well as for 4 hours afterwards.
    (So UP YOURS Ryan Dawson on this issue!)

    “HERO” NEEDED! Destroy/Damage H.A.A.R.P. & SAVE 30 MILLION PEOPLE!

    This is NOT a joke! These globalist bankster BASTARDS are planning to deliberately trigger a GIANT New Madrid Earthquake during the May 16-19 Military Exercise period just as was done in New Zealand during THEIR Military Exercise! If some brave soul were to drive their 4×4, a bulldozer or even a plane into as many of the H.A.A.R.P. antennas in Alaska BEFORE this time, they just MAY thwart this insidious plan. Remember there is NO congressional or any oversight in what H.A.A.R.P. has been used for. It has triggered quakes in Haiti, China, Iran, now New Zealand and even at the Suez Canal. THIS MUST BE STOPPED BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY! The plan is to trigger the quake while these FOREIGN TROOPS are deployed! Before the roads and bridges are trashed.
    (After viewing the mobile going SEA based version, this is the one that should be TARGETED!)

    WARN OTHERS NOW!! PLANNED New Madrid Earthqake / Human Culling

    READ THIS! PASS ON THESE LINKS! You need to be ARMED and stocked up and mentally prepared to SHOOT TROOPS pretending to be here to ‘help you.’ They will be taking you to die in FEMA camps instead and likely will be CANADIAN and NOT Americans!
    When you know ‘they’ are coming…. Bake them a nice cake!!

    Military Exercise goes live during New Zealand’s Largest E.Q. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yshY4e8we-I
    This video was forced DOWN! Hmmmmmm!
    Try this one instead:

    The New Zealand Air Force, Navy and Army was practicing an ‘EXERCISE’ of an earthquake when the real quake hit. JUST AS IS PLANNED HERE! Now, this is EXACTLY what is planned for the US from May 16-19 as you can read below. We have now had ‘practice’ runs in NZ, Haiti, China and elsewhere. There was even a quake at the mouth of the Suez Canal just as Iranian ships were entering.

    Joyce Reilly on “The Power Hour” talked about this scenario TODAY March 1, 2011. She started about 30 minutes into the first hour. You can hear the rebroadcast here:
    You can hear this after 10am EST TODAY!

    New Madrid Seismic Zone graphics, illustrations, diagrams Natural gas pipelines & NMSZ

    From May 16-19 there is scheduled to be a ‘National Level Exercise’ of a massive New Madrid Earthquake. You can google NLE 2011. Does spending this kind of money during an economic depression make sense to you for a supposed ‘ficticious’ scenario? I and others believe that troops (probably FOREIGN) will be pre-positioned before a REAL MASSIVE quake is deliberately triggered. Using a massive antennae system in Alaska called: H.A.A.R.P. These quakes have already been triggered in practice runs in Haiti, China and Iran and NOW New Zealand! There are also discussions of using a NUKE to seal the still-open BP Gulf oil well hole still polluting the ocean.


    MORE PROOF! Now TPTB aren’t looking so “Pretend” anymore!!!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mODURM671E8
    MORE PROOF: Something isn’t right. TPTB* are making Plans, and WE are being LIED TO! Pt 6 .mp4


    FEMA Wants MREs For 7m ‘Survivors’ In New Madrid Fault Zone

    FEMA Wants Underwater Body Bags For New Madrid Area? – Vid

    New Madrid Seismic Zone on MSNBC-Plan for earthquake NLE 2011 FEMA

    2012 Extinction-Part 6 New Madrid Earthquake Fault Will Divide The American Con183.wmv
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cislqOY-K94&feature=related WATCH THIS!!
    2010/11 New Madrid Earthquake 8.1 in next 24 months phenomenon in the sky before!

    Fatal Earthquakes 7.0 to 10.1 Coming World Wide, Why? & How To Be Prepared!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAPxfuDwedE &feature=related

    Many MANY more videos related can be seen on Youtube

    MORE PROOF that they intend to create a disaster, and that they know something!!!.

    FEMA is alread looking into buying 140 MILLION Meals ready to eat and 140 MILLION blankets in addition to THOUSANDS of underwater body bags.

    Mass bird kills and animal kills indicate the New Madrid faultline area is being targeted NOW.

    More PROOF that H.A.A.R.P. is behind the mass deaths of animals Pt.2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bks_LStwdu0&feature=watch_response

    Telltale signs of glowing red clouds have been seen above the targeted areas about a half hour before the quakes.

    HAARP caused earthquake in Sichuan China?

    Using ELF or (Extremely Low Frequency) waves, these build up underground until the energy is released in a massive shift. TROOPS MUST BE PRE-POSITIONED BEFORE THE QUAKE! This is vital to understand. After the quake, roads and bridges will be unusable and it will be more difficult to move troops and supplies. These troops will then be used to FORCEABLY take people to FEMA CAMPS. FEMA Training Cops To Place People In Camps
    FEMA Video Preps Kids For UFOs, Mega Earthquakes – Vid

    There you will be separated from your children and YOUR DEFENSES!! It is vital that you make preparations NOW before this happens. Power, water and sewage services will be destroyed. Stock water, supplies GUNS AND AMMO NOW! The globalists have a clear history of pre-positioning troops BEFORE staging a false flag attack. BEFORE 911, troops were pre-positioned to attack Afghanistan.

    This is also TIMED to occur as a smokescreen to the compete collapse of the US dollar triggered by shortages in Silver and Gold

    http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Regulators-close-Georgia-bank-apf-3866917524.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=main&asset=&ccode= http://harveyorgan.blogspot.com/2011/02/silver-in-complete-backwardation.html

    This New Madrid quake scenario has been forseen by many and ‘future maps of the USA’ are online:
    ALL of these maps show an ‘inland sea’ stretching from Lake Michigan South to the POISONED Gulf of Mexico. The New Madrid Quake will likely dump this water South and inundate many. If you have friends or relatives you could temporarily move supplies to and stay with during the few days in May this scenario plays out, it may be a wise move.

    AFTER the quake, be prepared to defend yourselves AND OTHERS from being forceably relocated. In the likely event these are FOREIGN troops doing this, SHOOT THE AMERICAN TRAITOR COMMANDER likely giving the orders to the foreign troops. This will help ISOLATE the foreign troops on American soil. Resupply will be almost impossible with roads and bridges down. WE WILL HAVE THE ADVANTAGE AND MUST PRESS IT HOME! Again this is assuming enough real patriotic Americans PREPARE NOW. So spread the word. When you see the troops, EXPECT THE QUAKE! Tell others NOW so this can NOT be passed off as any kind of ‘natural’ occurence.

    Plans are being made to silence dissent by shutting off the INTERNET. ZioNAZIs like Joe LIEberman are preparing to do here what was done in Egypt. The internet was turned back on in Egypt because people were quickly working AROUND the shutoff and the globalist control freaks don’t want you thinking about this and doing the same NOW. they also found they LOST CONTROL and are now using the internet to target dissenters.

    Obama ‘Kill Switch’ Bill Excludes Court Oversight

    SO DO IT! BE PREPARED! Get CB, marine, shortwave and ham radios NOW! Get phone numbers of like minded people and start sharing information NOW!
    Learn how to bypass the FEDs when censorship happens here.
    How To Talk If The Feds Shut Down The Internet
    Egypt Shows How Easy Internet Can Be Silenced
    How Egypt Shut Down The Internet
    How To Circumvent A Govt Internet Blackout

    These creepy control freak BASTARDS are even trying to prevent you from GROWING YOUR OWN FOOD or buying it during this economic collapse!

    Deliberate food shortages are being MADE TO HAPPEN and prices are rising and doubling quickly.

    Food Price Rises May Cause ‘Unrest’ (mass riots)

    What more proof do you need that THEY are your enemies? Ask folks down in Louisiana how much FEMA helped them during Katrina. Or how they are still being POISONED by CORREXIT spraying STILL over the still spewing oil blowout there.

    ‘COREXIT Did NOT Degrade – It Did Not Go Away’

    (Yes folks they did a dog and pony SHOW about supposedly closing the oil blowout)
    In fact, there is reason to believe this quake scenario will be triggered by a NUKE used to attempt to finally seal the breach. But given some interpretation of Bible prophecy, this “mountain of fire” may only blowout the hole larger and turn the whole ocean black and DEAD!
    Thousands and thousands of marine animals are already dying!


    What’s worse, the BP blowout may have been planned deliberately as well. The CEO and others sold their stock just a few weeks prior to the platform exposion. Shades of 911 stock short selling that was NEVER investigated when these led to CIA and Israeli sources.
    WTF movie ‘Knowing’ Predicted Oil Rig Explosion in the Gulf of Mexico 20 April 2010

    More Evidence US Military Involved In Gulf Disaster

    The globalists true to their PARASITIC form are buying CORREXIT POISONED seafood and providing it to our own KIDS!/ TROOPS!

    Gulf Seafood’s Safe, Everything’s OK, Keep Watching TV…

    National Police State vs We The People


    It’s WAY past time to STOP listening to morons or outright shills who call you a conspiracy theorist for saying the government is your enemy. There is enough proof on this page to be a wooden 2×4 to bash somebody upside their empty head with if they have any functioning neurons LEFT! If not, then MOVE PAST THEM! Keep posting this information for those who might actually SEE the danger and act before the event. That is all you can do but Biblically we are commanded to warn others.

    GET THIS INFO OUT!! Get it on as many different online groups and into email boxes NOW! All you are encouraging is preparedness for a catastrophic event. Even the Homeland GESTAPO pretends they want people to do this. But they secretly hope for apathy and laziness instead. So keep posting, Keep Posting KEEP POSTING this info up through the May exercise timetable. By doing so, maybe we can give these satanic BASTARDS good reasons for thinking twice before attacking and murdering more Americans.

    PARASITES are in control of the U.S. government, media and our courts. They have a long sordid history of attacking good people, morals and polluting nations with THEIR perversion and THEIR people.

    Just as they are working very HARD to do to U.S. NOW!

    If you have any doubt whatsoever who actually attacked this nation on 911, you NEED to look at the facts and EVIDENCE here:

    How Zionism Infiltrated And Conquered The US – Vid

    Jewish Influence In The US Government


  67. Terri In NC says:

    Thirteen year-old Ariana Goldboldo was abducted from her home at gunpoint on March 24. Her captors have systematically poisoned her through injections of a dangerous psychoactive drug. There is also reason to believe that Ariana, who has reportedly tested positive for an STD, has been molested during her time in captivity.

    Ariana’s mother, Maryanne, made a valiant but futile effort to protect her daughter. As a result, she may end up in prison. If this happens, Ariana almost certainly won’t survive.

    Godboldo, a college dance instructor, had attempted to school her daughter at home, but eventually decided to place the youngster in a local government school. This meant that the girl would have to undergo a government-dictated suite of vaccinations.

    Shortly after receiving the injections, the girl experienced severe side-effects, including behavioral problems she hadn’t previously experienced.

    When Godboldo consulted with local health and welfare officials, she was told that her daughter would have to receive regular injections of Risperdal, supposedly to counteract the effects of the other government-mandated vaccinations.

    Among the documented side-effects of that drug are tardive dyskinesia (difficulty with basic motor skills) and severe emotional problems – including suicidal thoughts. When Godboldo’s long-suffering child began to display those symptoms, the mother refused to continue with the injections.

    The local “child protection” bureaucracy – which, like all other agencies of its kind, subscribes to the totalitarian legal assumption that children certified by and registered with the State are its property and therefore decreed that Godboldo was “in denial about her daughter’s mental health issue.”

    Evidently it is impermissible for parents to entertain such reservations about the wisdom of those clothed in the purported authority of the State, or to resist their prescriptions, no matter what. Sure, Ariana might die or be driven irretrievably mad as a result of government-mandated treatment – but this was a decision for the Anointed Ones to make, and for parents to accept with proper docility.

    Accordingly, the CPS authorized itself to “liberate” Godboldo’s daughter in order to continue poisoning her with Risperdal injections. A small team of government kidnappers – CPS workers and Detroit Police officers – materialized on Godboldo’s doorstep, demanding that she surrender the child.

    “They broke into my home illegally in an effort to take my daughter,” Godboldo recalls. “They had no documentation that said they were allowed to enter my home.” Godboldo, acting on her natural authority as a parent to protect her child, refused to let the kidnappers take her daughter.

    Well, when Godboldo refused to let CPS take her daughter, a home invasion team – led, appropriately, by a veteran of the Iraq occupation, Lt. Michael Nied – forced its way into the home. Nied claims that Godboldo fired a gunshot that sprayed him with drywall residue and made his little heart quiver. He and his fellow heroes retreated and called in a “barricaded gunman situation.” A ten-hour siege then ensued.

    Prudential considerations aside, Godboldo would have been well within her rights to gun down the kidnappers, had she possessed the means to do so. She hadn’t committed a criminal offense, and the police didn’t bother to bring along one of those cunning little permission slips judges reflexively issue any time police want to invade a home. In moral and legal terms they were no better than any other gang of armed intruders or domestic terrorists.

    Eventually a paramilitary SWAT team – complete with automatic weapons, armored personnel carriers, and helicopters – was dispatched to surround Godboldo’s home. The mother eventually surrendered and was put in jail on a $500,000 bond. Although Maryanne was released on bail, her daughter remains in the custody of her abductors, undergoing forcible injections of a drug that is slowly destroying her body and mind – and, quite possibly, being subjected to sexual violation as well.

    Godboldo can take a small measure of comfort in the fact that Ariana – unlike Aiyana Jones, who was murdered by a Detroit SWAT team in a gratuitous raid staged for a “reality TV” program a year ago – is still alive. But the risk to that child increases with every minute she remains in the custody of Michigan’s child “protection” service.

    Last year, Detroit ABC affiliate WXYZ presented a detailed report on the murder of 10-year-old Johnny Andron, a child suffering from epilepsy and cerebral palsy who was seized by the state and starved to death in what was referred to as a “foster care facility.” Johnny’s mother Elena, a single parent, devoted most of her free time to caring for her wheelchair-bound son.

    After she lost her factory job, Elena made the tragic error of seeking “help” from the child “welfare” system, which makes a federally subsidized profit each time it steals a child from its parents. Johnny was made a “temporary ward of the state,” a judicial designation that was tantamount to a death sentence. The same was true of Elena’s parental rights, since the same ruling placed her on a central registry of “abusive” and “neglectful” parents. She was placed inside the hamster wheel of government-approved “parenting classes” taught by profiteering busybodies who’ve attached themselves like boxcars to the federal gravy train.

    For months, Elena struggled to find and keep a new job while dutifully attending classes that did nothing but clutter her schedule. During the same period she watched her son, who had been a hefty child but – considering his disabilities – a healthy one, slowly waste away through deliberate criminal neglect.

    Infuriated that her child was being tortured to death through starvation, Elena dared to complain. This action was taken as evidence of her unsuitability to be a parent. She was summoned to court and informed by a black-robed functionary that she wouldn’t be permitted any further visits with her son. She had no further contact with Johnny, and no updates on his status until a representative of the government crime syndicate that had taken him hostage announced to her that he had died.

    Welcome to the Amerikan Soyuz:

    Mike Ratte nearly lost his seven-year-old son into Michigan’s foster-care gulag after mistakenly allowing the child to take a sip from a beverage called Mike’s Hard Lemonade during a Tigers game in 2008. Ratte, a professor of archeology at the University of Michigan, didn’t know that the product contained alcohol. Since the sign advertising the drink described it only as “Mike’s Lemonade,” Ratte assumed that it was a badly overpriced soft drink.

    Leo took a sip of the beverage, immediately found it distasteful, and placed the bottle on the floor near his bleacher seat. Shortly before the game ended a Comerica Park security guard waddled over, picked up the bottle, and asked Ratte if his son had been drinking from it.(Another Michigan family recently had a similar but scarier experience, due to a mix-up at an Applebee’s restaurant.)

    As described in a civil complaint filed on behalf of the family, Mike and Leo were forced to take an ambulance ride to a nearby hospital, where Leo was forced to endure a blood test that confirmed the absence of alcohol in his body. While his son was being needlessly bled and perforated, Mike was taken to a separate room and questioned by Officer Celeste Reed of the Detroit Police Department’s Child Abuse Division.

    When she finally acknowledged to Ratte that she and her comrades were going to steal his son, Reed played the Nuremberg Defense card, blaming a superior who was “pushing this case to impress her new boss.” Once Leo was in custody, however, Reed took the initiative, perjuriously claiming in her report that officers had “observed [Leo] to be intoxicated.”

    Leo was sequestered from his family and put into temporary foster care while the CPS bureaucracy labored to find some way to make their abduction permanent. The “referee” assigned to the case announced that she would keep it open for a week. However, Mike and his wife – unlike most of the families victimized by the child-snatchers – were people of means and influence. With the help of a capable attorney they were able to free their son after a mere two days’ captivity.

    By way of contrast, Elena Andron and Maryanne Godboldo have been traduced as “neglectful” parents because they sought to preserve their handicapped children from state-sanctioned harm. As a result, Elena’s son Johnny is dead, and the same people responsible for that atrocity will quite possibly kill Ariana unless Maryanne is able to rescue her from the child “protection” system.

    If Maryanne goes to prison, her daughter will die. At present, her prosecution on assault charges is being held in abeyance pending a ruling from the Michigan State Supreme Court in a case “that will determine if residents have the right to defend themselves from police officers entering a home without proper authority,” reports the Detroit News.

    Embedded in this delay is a critical admission by the prosecution – namely, that Godboldo is correct in claiming that the CPS raid was conducted without legal authority. Unfortunately – albeit predictably – the Michigan Court of Appeals has ruled that it is, in all circumstances, a “felony” for a Mundane to obstruct or resist the aggressive violence of a police officer acting without lawful authority.

    In a 1999 ruling (People v. Wess), the Michigan Court of Appeals, citing the state legal code, admitted that citizens had a right, explicitly protected by state statute, “to use such reasonable force as is necessary to prevent an illegal attachment and to resist an illegal arrest.” However, in the dicta of that ruling the court all but begged for either the legislature or the state Supreme Court to change the law:

    “We share the concerns of other jurisdictions that the right to resist an illegal arrest is an outmoded and dangerous doctrine, and we urge our Supreme Court to reconsider this doctrine at the first available opportunity…. we see no benefit to continuing the right to resist an otherwise peaceful arrest made by a law enforcement officer, merely because the arrestee believes the arrest is illegal. Given modern procedural safeguards for criminal defendants, the ‘right’ only preserves the possibility that harm will come to the arresting officer or the defendant.”

    I particularly like that line about “procedural safeguards” – not.

    So in 2002, the Michigan state legislature modified the relevant section of the state code (MCL 705.81d) by removing the clause recognizing the common law right to “use such reasonable force as is necessary to prevent” an unlawful arrest (that is, an armed kidnapping) by a police officer.

    In a 2004 ruling (People v. Ventura) that dealt with a self-defense claim against an unlawful arrest, the Court of Appeals, in a perfectly nauseating display of mock humility, proclaimed that “it is not within our province to disturb our Legislature’s obvious affirmative choice to modify the traditional common-law rule that a person may resist an unlawful arrest.”
    Of course, the legislature made that “choice” after being invited to do so by the same Court of Appeals.

    In the 2008 case headed for the state Supreme Court (People v. Moreno), the Appeals Court observed that “we find no reference to the lawfulness of the arrest or detaining act” in the statute, which “states only that an individual who resists a person the individual knows or has reason to know is performing his duties is guilty of a felony.”

    As the Michigan Court of Appeals acknowledged, the Common Law recognizes an unqualified right to resist an unlawful arrest. The Constitution – for whatever it’s worth – reinforces that right by placing due process impediments (such as the necessity of obtaining search warrants) on the ability of armed hirelings in government-issued costumes to inflict themselves on their betters. But the Court of Appeals – like every statist body of its kind – insists that the costume trumps the Common Law and the Constitution.

    Now let’s return to the notion that the right to resist arrest has become “outmoded” because of the “procedural safeguards” that supposedly protect criminal defendants. In the Moreno case – the one bound for the Michigan Supreme Court – the “criminal” act of resistance was a demand that police get a search warrant before entering a home, and then closing the door when the police refused to leave.

    The trial court agreed that Moreno acted within his rights by refusing to permit police to invade his home illegally. The position taken by the state Court of Appeals is that merely uttering the phrase “Not without a warrant” can be construed as grounds for arrest, and that any physical act intended to prevent that illegal arrest constitutes a felony.

    Ariana Godboldo has never been charged with a crime; neither had her mother, until
    she engaged in a heroic but doomed effort to protect her child from an assault on their home that the prosecution now tacitly admits was unlawful.

    As Elena Andron and countless other parents have learned, there are no procedural safeguards for parental rights or the individual rights of children once the CPS intervenes.

    The federally subsidized child “protection” universe is a joint production of Lenin, Kafka and Salvador Dali in which power means everything, facts and law mean nothing, and the contours of “reality” are warped in the service of self-enraptured bureaucrats.

    Unless a parent is a person of means and influence, like Mike Ratte, active resistance may be the only way to keep his child or children from disappearing into the CPS Archipelago once the family comes to the attention of the child-snatchers. Ideally, this would mean pro-active measures to conceal a targeted child, or to provide for the child’s escape in the event the child-snatchers arrive.

    As the abduction of Ariana Godboldo demonstrates, the child “protection” apparatus is literally at war with American parents, and Amerikan stormtroopers are prepared to murder any parent determined to keep his children out of the hands of those who drug them, starve them, and molest them with impunity.

  68. Terri In NC says:

    From Jeanette 04/18/2011
    Affidavit – Letter to SEC Re; CRIS Fraud 4 18 2011: ALL COURT CASES! FILE! FILE! FILE!


    To SEC
    San Fransisco, CA

    and to all others to whom it applies,

    Three attachments included in entirety by reference;

    1.) Jeanette’s affidavit, Goelz, Pacific County 9 21 2010
    2.) Invoice to FSCME 01 27 09.pdf
    3.) IRS 3949 a American Bankers Association modified w o fraud report

    RE: Notice for Further Investigation Needed


    The three above referenced attachments provide supporting evidence to the ongoing (CRIS) COURT REGISTRY INVESTMENT SYSTEM initiated by the SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION (herein SEC), but not limited to.

    It has come to my attention that The Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) has begun an investigation on COURT REGISTRY INVESTMENT SYSTEM (CRIS), A connection, Herein is advised, to which is followed through and into a company dba as LUCENT, but shall not be solely limited to .

    Though not yet verified this investigation to be true, it is in fact, warranted, as the two incorporated in entirety attachments well support.

    Attached 1.) ;Jeanette Audrey; [Triplett],( herein, Herein),affidavit provided supporting evidence that such investigation shall prove successful, and to which Herein claims finders fees and/or section 4 14th amendment bounty claims thereto.

    This affidavit has been entered into court cases and is public record via the web as public record, not to be construed as secondary inadmissible hearsay evidence.

    Attachment 2.)” Invoice to FSCME 01 27 09.pdf”, includes and supports court cases in which yet unknown COMMITTEE ON UNIFORM IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURES (CUSIP) numbers were assigned for deposits directly into the Dallas/Houston Texas Federal Reserve Bank for investment purposes, and unjust enrichment through fraud and deception.

    Attachment 3.) IRS 3949 a American Bankers Association modified w o fraud report connects attachments 1.) and 2.) and was sent to the IRS in about November 2008 in a 620 page all inclusive by reference detailed fraud report compiled by Herein.

    These three attachments alone show a pattern of racketeering enterprising with/by/through/ the banks by court officials, in violation of their oath to uphold the Constitution and in violation of the Judicial canons whereby the officers of the courts are, in fact, acting under color of law with forethought and malice and intent having vested interest in each/all case brought before the alleged court, intentionally and knowingly through use of insider trading rather than merits of arguments by unwilling victims dragged through an alleged court that is really a union dues paid membership of the FEDERATION OF COUNTY, STATE, MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, further explained in great detail in “TRIAL LAWYERS INC REPORT, 2003″, (see page 20 THE BEST FRIENDS MONEY CAN BUY).

    A Department of Public Debt Form 1522, 4000 et al is filled out by the court clerk Administrator, who, MUST be a member of CUSIP©, a registered copyrighted trademark of the American Bankers Association, wherein copyright infringement applies otherwise.

    Pursuant to the US Bankruptcy of 1933, Public Law 1 48Stat, 1, and HR 1491, ALL DEBTS of Americans are to be ‘DISCHARGED” as in any Bankruptcy.

    However, The Office of the COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY, also located in Texas, has failed to discharge any of the people’s debts, even though repeated notices have been sent to that office.

    In other words, the courts and banks are creating debts, for which the COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY has breached the contract to discharge the people’s debts since 1933 there has been no lawful currency for the people but only “BANK NOTES.” This conspiracy , not a theory but a fact, is supported by the letters to and from the Rothschild’s written in about June 1863, see “A COUNTRY DEFEATED IN VICTORY PART II”, an excerpt taken from “VINDICATION”, BOOK 2,Rutherford..

    What has transpired, since 1933 to date, is that the above referenced agencies, have wrongfully and unlawfully, taken positions as Constitutional offices, i.e. The courts, judges, clerks et al, but, in fact, are instead operating as corporations evidenced as numerous D&B documents support, and through use of the above referenced but not limited to forms.

    The indebtedness of every county across the country is due specifically to the money laundering operation by the above named entities, but not limited to. Offices that accept tax payers money as salary but only in turn represent corporate status, including the ATTORNEY GENERAL of every state, in violation of the office holder oath of office.

    Again, the Constitutional offices, accepting federal funding and salaries as such offices, but, then these alleged Constitutional Offices transfer all monies into CORPORATIONS having the same name, however, through fraud and deception by corporate status indicated by capitalization of the same letters and/or variations thereof, i.e. Attorney General vs ATTORNEY GENERAL, court vs COURT, judge vs JUDGE et al, the general public not aware of the slight of hand and resulting fraud, but have been defrauded by the actions thereof nonetheless.

    The three attachments, previously entered in on and for the record as evidence of this stated fraud, and so much more, supports the SEC’s investigation of Securities Fraud by use of CRIS, orders for which are signed by numerous Federal Bankruptcy Court judges, having no case number, nor parties thereto.

    Upon the SEC investigating this, or any other securities fraud, pursuing only the holder of the CRIS files, is insufficient and does not complete a thorough investigation, by any means.

    A complete thorough investigation across the nation, including; dating back to 1933, the name of the individual(s) on the case to which a public debt form was filed to the Department of the Treasury to obtain the CUSIP number, all bank account numbers, either here or abroad to which any/all proceeds thereof were deposited, the signing agent(s) thereof, and and audit of the CORPORATION TRUST COMPANY of Delaware, who acts as the transfer agent and to which all Securities, Bonds, Stocks, Mortgages, Contracts et al are unlawfully held, pursuant to and in violation of the Articles of incorporation of the CORPORATION TRUST COMPANY OF AMERICA, dated 1907, amended April 15, 1930, to CORPORATION TRUST COMPANY, three years prior to the US Bankruptcy of 1933.

    Any/all investigations into the above referenced entities must and shall include the herein advised procedures, although not limited to.

    Any investigation, by any agency, not following Herein’s advise,after the fact, could only be construed as additional cover up or worse, including but not limited to bribes accepted or bribes given by any listed herein party , past ,present or in the future.

    Be advised if the SEC has not yet begun the referenced investigation upon a company named LUCENT for allegedly holding the court CRIS accounts, it is warranted to do so.

    For more supporting evidence and documentation thereof please visit landrightsnfarming.blogspot.com See one of Herein’s latest papers entitled L 2 NT (LUCENT TO NIKOLA TESLA).

    Herein again requests any/all debts bearing Herein or spouse debts to be discharged in entirety, including any court and/or utility debts, nor or in the future.

    Should the addressees of this Notice for Further Investigation Need any further documentation please feel free to contact Herein at

    ;Jeanette Audrey; [Triplett]

    Invoice to Federation of State, County, Municipal Employees

    IRS 3949-A American Bankers Association

    From Jeanette 04/21/2011
    CRIS corporations relevant

  69. Terri In NC says:

    From E.J.
    Entitlement my ass….

    Entitlement my ass, I paid cash for my social security insurance!!!! Just because they borrowed the money, doesn’t make my benefits some kind of charity or handout! Congressional benefits, aka free healthcare , outrageous retirement packages , 67 paid holidays , three weeks paid vacation , unlimited paid sick days , now that’s welfare , and they have the nerve to call my retirement entitlements !!!

    What the HELL’s wrong?


    Tuesday’s Daily Bulletin paper, ran two articles on the front page side by side :
    1- California’s 20 Billion Dollar Budget Deficit
    2- The California Supreme Court ruling that ILLEGALS can attend college and get benefits.

    Why don’t they just deport them when they arrive to register?

    3- Last year they ran an article on the yearly costs to California Taxpayers from Illegals using Hospital Emergency Rooms for their general health care –

    At just one hospital the cost to tax payers totaled over 25 million a year

    Someone please tell me what the HELL’s wrong with all the people that run this country?

    We’re “broke” & can’t help our own Seniors, Veterans, Orphans, Homeless etc.?

    In the last months we have provided aid to Haiti, Chile, and Turkey. And now Pakistan. Literally, BILLIONS of DOLLARS!

    Our retired seniors living on a ‘fixed income’ receive no aid nor do they get any breaks while our government and religious organizations pour Hundreds of Billions of $$$$$$’s and Tons of Food to Foreign Countries!

    They call Social Security and Medicare an entitlement even though most of us have been paying for it all our working lives and now when it’s time for us to collect, the government is running out of money. Why did the government borrow from it in the first place?

    We have hundreds of adoptable children who are shoved aside to make room for the adoption of foreign orphans.

    AMERICA: a country where we have homeless without shelter, children going to bed hungry, elderly going without ‘needed’ meds, and mentally ill without treatment etc,etc.

    They have a ‘Benefit’ for the people of Haiti on 12 TV stations, ships and planes lining up with food, water, tents clothes, bedding, doctors and medical supplies.

    Imagine if the *GOVERNMENT* gave ‘US’ the same support they give to other countries.

    Sad isn’t it?

  70. Terri In NC says:

    Carl just sent this over;
    From: John Stuart
    To: undisclosed-recipients:
    Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 11:52 AM
    Subject: Fwd: Urgent

    You all are well aware by now how much I despise pay-tri-idiot bullshit, those carpetbaggers have killed more of us then the terrorists.
    But what I am forwarding you appears to have some teeth and is legally sound, for the most part.

    You may want to sign up as a Plaintiff.

    I have added the TERRET SCOTUS case I stumbled upon because I think it adds incontrovertible evidence no man is required to pay for what he objects to:

    “… . Consistent with the constitution of Virginia the legislature could not create or continue a religious establishment which should have exclusive rights and prerogatives, or compel the citizens to worship under a stipulated form or discipline, or to pay taxes to those whose creed they could not conscientiously believe. …”
    This case needs to be added to the action since the ruling has NEVER been overturned or abrogated.
    John, watch this link completely. Join up and get on the plaintiff list.
    Send this to everyone you know.

    The case is below.

    Hello All,

    Well, at long last, you now have a copy of the draft Supreme Court case. There may still be ( are ) still some typos, but is is in essentially finished form. You can share it as you see fit. Especially if it helps bring in Plaintiffs.

    Terrett Case File

    SCOTUS Original Action 04212011

  71. Terri In NC says:

    He called him a miserable S-O-B!
    Some rough language and I apologize for that. I left it in however to help show the frustration this guy and many others are feeling. I agree with him 100%. More people need to get angry.

    Political? Your call.

    I think he is really, really, mad—as he should be–and as we should be. So–how do we change it?

    Alan Simpson, Senator from Wyoming, Co-Chair of Obama’s deficit commission, calls senior citizens the Greediest Generation as he compared “Social Security” to a Milk Cow with 310 million teats.

    Here’s a response in a letter from a unknown fellow in Montana …I think he is a little ticked off! He also tells it like it is!

    “Hey Alan, let’s get a few things straight..

    1. As a career politician, you have been on the public dole for FIFTY YEARS.

    2. I have been paying Social Security taxes for 48 YEARS (since I was 15 years old. I am now 63).

    3 My Social Security payments, and those of millions of other Americans, were safely tucked away in an interest bearing account for decades until you political pukes decided to raid the account and give OUR money to a bunch of zero ambition losers in
    return for votes, thus bankrupting the system and turning Social Security into a Ponzi scheme that would have made Bernie Madoff proud.

    4. Recently, just like Lucy & Charlie Brown, you and your ilk pulled the proverbial football away from millions of American seniors nearing retirement and moved the goalposts for full retirement from age 65 to age 67. NOW, you and your shill commission is proposing to move the goalposts YET AGAIN.

    5. I, and millions of other Americans, have been paying into Medicare from Day One, and now you morons propose to change the rules of the game. Why? Because you idiots mismanaged other parts of the economy to such an extent that you need to steal money from Medicare to pay the bills.

    6. I, and millions of other Americans, have been paying income taxes our entire lives, and now you propose to increase our taxes yet again. Why? Because you incompetent
    bastards spent our money so profligately that you just kept on spending even after you ran out of money. Now, you come to the American taxpayers and say you need more to pay off YOUR debt.

    To add insult to injury, you label us “greedy” for calling “bullshit” on your incompetence. Well, Captain Bullshit, I have a few questions for YOU.

    1. How much money have you earned from the American taxpayers during your pathetic 50-year political career?

    2. At what age did you retire from your pathetic political career, and how much are you receiving in annual retirement benefits from the American taxpayers?

    3. How much do you pay for YOUR government provided health insurance?

    4. What cuts in YOUR retirement and healthcare benefits are you proposing in your disgusting deficit reduction proposal, or, as usual, have you exempted yourself and your political cronies?

    It is you, Captain Bullshit, and your political co-conspirators called Congress who are the “greedy”ones. It is you and your fellow nutcases who have bankrupted America and stolen the American dream from millions of loyal, patriotic taxpayers. And for what? Votes. That’s right, sir. You and yours have bankrupted America for the sole purpose of advancing your pathetic political careers. You know it, we know it, and you know that we know it.

    And you can take that to the bank, you miserable son of a bitch.

    Maybe pissed off; but inspired!

  72. Terri In NC says:

    Here is a Lady to be proud of. This is an elected employee willing to keep her oath and get in the fight. She also needs help. If she is in your County, call her and help her in any way you can. For those of you not in Montgomery County PA, forward this on to the Recorder of Deeds in your County and get them involved. The big mortgage banks are getting away with not paying money into the county by using MERS. They are doing it unlawfully and nobody is doing anything about it. Well, Nancy Becker is and she needs other Recorders to stand with her. This is an issue we can all get behind. This is also an issue the Sheriff needs to be investigating.


  73. Terri In NC says:

    Not for profits

    As you open your pockets for the next natural disaster, please keep these facts in mind:

    The American Red Cross President and CEO Marsha J. Evans salary for the year was $651,957, plus expenses and other perks!

    The United Way President Brian Gallagher receives a $375,000 base salary along with numerous expense benefits.

    UNICEF CEO Caryl M. Stern receives $1,200,000 per year (100k per month) plus all expenses including a ROLLS ROYCE !! Less than 5 cents of your donated dollar goes to the cause!!

    ( THERE SHOULD BE A LAW AGAINIST THIS TYPE OF FRAUD !!). (Of course this is handled by the U.N. what else could you expect??)

    The Salvation Army’s Commissioner Todd Bassett receives a salary of only $13,000 per year (plus housing) for managing this $2 billion dollar organization and 96 percent of donated dollars go to the cause.

    The American Legion National Commander receives a $0.00 zero salary. 100% of your donations go to help Veterans and their families and youth!

    No further comment should be necessary. Please share this with everyone you can.

  74. Terri In NC says:

    Keep in mind the LAWS of this country PRE 1861 are still in force..i.e.,never repealed !
    (Statutes at Large). Great case.

    Chisholm vs. Georgia

  75. Terri In NC says:

    6th Judge Steps Down On Richard Fine Case

    Los Angeles, CA In a six-minute video report, former United States Prosecutor Richard I. Fine Ph.D., and Deputy District Attorney Steve Ipsen reveal a developing threat to the Justice System when State Superior Court Judges do not disclose to litigants that they are receiving bonus payments from the County while sitting on cases where a County is party to a case before them. In California there are 1600 Judges, 90 percent of whom received County bonuses, who now have received retroactive immunity from criminal prosecution and disciplinary action for taking the money. A 2009 Senate Bill SBX2 11 was quietly enacted without any public discussion or debate to protect the Judges and government officials involved in the scheme that was held illegal in the Sturgeon v. County of L.A. 2008 case. Yet the conflict still exists and the bonus payments continue to this day. Watch video here

    Judicial Wall of Resistance Broken
    To date, six Superior Court Judges have resigned, recused, side-stepped or been disqualified from sitting on the Richard Fine case (Marina Strand Colony II Home Owners Association v. County of L.A.). The latest Judge to “Recuse” himself was State Superior Court Judge James Chalfant, who has received $608,000 from L.A. County according to the County Auditor’s Report obtained by Richard I. Fine, who said, “The Judge had no choice but to recuse himself from sitting on my Motion to Null and Void all of Judge David Yaffe’s Orders, including his Civil Contempt Order.” That Order held Fine In solitary “coercive confinement” for eighteen months in the L.A. County Jail.

    Read court documents: Links in right hand column.


  76. Terri In NC says:

    My 2 Cents…I’ve been studying the BC for years…I’ve seen all sorts of BCs including the original Army hospital copy of Mine with a wet signature from the attending physician (on a Mass. Form 3 and one of 3 “originals” …a typed top copy and two carbon versions all with wet sigs) one of which (probably the typed original) was given to the town for “registration.” My parents got one of the carbons with a wet sig and I ended up with that one. The other carbon (most likely the 2nd copy) version was probably retained by the Army hospital (which was demolished sometime in the 70s or 80s).

    Now, a funny thing happened at the Town. For some reason they re-typed the original from the Army before they registered it in their book. Why ? I can only guess it was because my name was in both upper and lower case, because this new copy had my mother’s maiden name misspelled and it didn’t have the attending physician’s wet sig…And, YES, this new “registered” copy now had my name in all caps. I didn’t notice the misspell or the all caps until I had ordered a “certified” copy from the state a couple of years back. I only discovered it because I was comparing “it” with the “original carbon” (with a wet sig) I had ! And, I noticed that there was no wet sig of the attending physician even though the “certification” clearly said it was a “true copy attest” ! And, then the all caps, etc., etc.

    Now, the question is: Does the Town still have a copy of the original from the Army hospital that they re-typed ? Or, did they gun it ? I’ve talked with them and can’t get a straight answer from them. And, it’s been 66 years since this all happened, so I don’t know if I can get any answers or not. But, it does seem that the all caps thing must have some significance to both the Town and the state (Mass.), and probably the Fed Gov !

    The thing that stuck in my mind in the doc that was attached to this email was:
    “All Christian births used to be recorded in the family Bible only. The
    reason for instituting the Birth Certificate is so the state can claim title
    to your person. It is a common law principle that says “what one creates one may control.”

    Those records in the family Bible were created by what or whom ? A living being…your parents (most likely) and NOT a fictional entity known as the Town or the State or the Fed Gov ! So, your living parents controlled You…NOT the fictions. No wonder they switched the paradigm to one of “registration” – because now they (the fictions) created it (the BC) and can control it (and YOU) ! If they can control YOU and IT (that which they created) then they can create anything they want from it, including, oh, I don’t know, an account, maybe ?

    Is it becoming a little clearer ? Or, is it raising more questions ? Keep digging in the rabbit hole ! I don’t think we’re wrong


    This past weekend some of us got an email about the Birth Certificate with thoughts on why the name is usually in ALL-CAPS. Here’s a link to it with an addendum. http://min.us/mvjoRIQ

    Why The Birth Certificate Is In ALL CAPS document

  77. Terri In NC says:

    139 People Vs Goldman Sachs

    To fully grasp the case against Goldman, one first needs to understand that the financial crime wave described in the Levin report came on the heels of a decades-long lobbying campaign by Goldman and other titans of Wall Street, who pleaded over and over for the right to regulate themselves

  78. Terri In NC says:

    Indiana: Full Frontal Fascism

    Something very significant–and largely unreported–just happened
    in Indiana. I just posted a rant about it here:

    The plain text version of the article is below.
    Larken Rose
    Indiana: Full Frontal Fascism

    Something huge–huge and not good–just happened in Indiana, which will be little more than a blip in the propaganda that passes for national news. The Supreme Court of Indiana just ruled that in Indiana, if a police officer decides to ILLEGALLY come into your house, you’re not allowed to do anything to stop him. According to
    “Justice” Steven David, resisting an admittedly “UNLAWFUL police entry into a home” is against “public policy.” Got that? If you live in Indiana, and a cop decides to invade your home without a shred of legal justification, it is considered a CRIME for you to do anything to stop him.

    Bizarrely, “Justice” David also said that resisting law-breaking cops goes against “modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence.” You see, only judges are wise enough to know that when the Fourth Amendment says you have a right to be free from “unreasonable searches and seizures,” it actually means that the cops have the right to COMMIT “unreasonable searches and seizures,” and you have no right to do
    anything to stop it.

    Please allow me to toot my own horn here, by pointing out that in my novel, “The Iron Web” (page 231), I predicted this step occurring. It is an essential, major step towards totalitarianism, for the control freaks to decide that even when they break their own laws, their victims have no right to resist. There is a huge PRINCIPLE at stake here, and what these three Indiana jackass “judges” have just done is guarantee either complete totalitarianism, or a bloody revolution (or both, in that order). Because this ruling means, quite literally, that residence of Indiana have NO RIGHTS AT ALL. What would it possibly mean to say you have a “right” to not have your home illegally invaded by a jackbooted thug, while also saying that you cannot do anything to defend that right?

    Never fear, because, according to the Supreme Jackass Court of Indiana, you can always come crawling to your masters, after you’ve been illegally victimized by one of their jackboots, to beg for some restitution. (Good luck with that.) “Justice” David says that, AFTER you let the cop illegally invade your home, you can always “protest the illegal entry through the court system.” That’s almost straight out of my novel, where a new (fictional) law would “make it a crime to forcibly resist any arrest, while also providing legal remedies to those who have been subjected to improper arrest.”

    If anyone considers this reasonable, keep in mind that by the exact same “reasoning” (and I use that term extremely loosely), they might as well also rule that if a cop decides to shoot your dog, or steal your car, or rape your wife, you have to quietly
    stand by and LET HIM DO IT, and then later file a complaint, or a lawsuit. In other words, the jackboots can do ABSOLUTELY ANYTHING THEY DAMN WELL PLEASE, “legal” or not, and your ONLY recourse is to later whine to the very control freaks that the jackboots work for.

    What was the rationale for this? In case all of the above wasn’t Orwellian enough, check this out. “Justice” David argued that “allowing resistance [to law-breaking cops] unnecessarily escalates the level of violence and therefore the risk of injuries
    to all parties involved.” Why wouldn’t this psychotic reasoning (a.k.a. “retroactive tyranny justification”) also mean that if ANYONE breaks into your house, or assaults you, or steals your stuff, or otherwise attacks you, you’d better LET HIM DO IT in order to avoid “escalat[ing] the level of violence”? Using DEFENSIVE violence to
    combat AGGRESSIVE violence is completely justified and righteous, notwithstanding the opinions of the tyranny apologists appointed by the parasite class. If a cop illegally barges into your home, you have every right to escalate the level of violence to any extent necessary to stop him, including blowing the fascist’s damn head off.

    I’m glad I don’t live in Indiana, because if some cop decided to barge into my house without a shred of legal justification, I’d now know that if I tried to hold him back, or push him out, I’d be arrested and prosecuted. So I’d just have to shoot the bastard
    instead. And since it’s tough to do that sort of thing without anyone noticing, I would then be a fugitive, for having DEFENDED my family against an invading CRIMINAL. And if that much happened, and I was forced to become a fugitive, I might feel obliged to go pay a visit to the three stupid, tyrant-loving fascist jackasses on the Indiana Supreme Court who just decided to declare it a CRIME for someone to
    DEFEND HIMSELF against illegal trespassing, breaking and entering, and assault, if the scumbag attacker happens to have a badge.

    Hmmm, I have an idea. If there are any Indiana cops who still respect the Constitution, please do your state a huge favor, and go barge into the home of “Justice” Steven David–during supper would probably be a good time. Barge in, without a warrant, and without any legal justification, guns drawn, and start ordering
    people around. See if “Justice” David does anything to resist. If he does, lock his fascist ass up for violating his own idiotic legal ruling. In fact, since he just declared it to be illegal for him to resist your illegal invasion of his home, if he lifts a finger to stop you, shoot the bastard, or at least give him a good tasering. (That’s exactly what happened in the case where “Justice” David sided with the law-breaking cop.) After all, we can’t just let people assault police officers, now can we? If some Indiana cop had the spine to do that, I know several thousand people who would be thrilled beyond words.

    Larken Rose

    (P.S. Incidentally, in U.S. vs. John Bad Elk, the U.S. Supreme Court made it clear that resisting an unlawful arrest, even if doing so requires killing the cop, can be legal. Whether this conflict between the Supreme Court and the Indiana Nazi Brigade will be resolved in court remains to be seen. But whatever any black-dress-wearing,
    wooden-hammer-wielding narcissist says, if someone decides to barge into your home, you have the right to evict him, with a harsh word, a fist, or a 12-gauge–whichever you deem necessary.)
    No law compels a private-sector non-governmentally-privileged work eligible man or woman to submit a form W-4 or W-9 (or their equivalents), nor to obtain or disclose an SSN as a condition of being hired or keeping one’s job. With the exception of an order from a court of competent jurisdiction issued by a duly qualified judge, no amounts can be lawfully taken from one’s pay (for taxes, fees or other charges) without the worker’s explicit, intentional, knowing, voluntary, written consent.

  79. Terri In NC says:

    Judge says: “Internet Goofballs” have to pay their taxes! Create a record for yourself an go to jail!

    IRS Court Case 05/15/2011 pdf

  80. Terri In NC says:

    Here is a good site to go to.
    Once there, scroll down on the left side and click on “Aid and Abet Newsletter”. There are many articles on the Sheriff but be sure and read the one titled “When Sheriff’s Fail”.

  81. Terri In NC says:

    Breaking The Code: Oklahoma Judges And Misconduct

    OKLAHOMA CITY — Judges are charged with making some of life’s most important decisions. That’s why we hold them to such high standards. But what recourse do Oklahomans have when they violate those standards? In the past it’s been very difficult to hold Oklahoma judges accountable, but changes are on the horizon.

    In 2006 the Honorable Donald Thompson was accused of doing something so dishonorable, to many, it was unbelievable.

    “It was a fall from grace of epic proportion. When I first got the allegations, I didn’t believe them,” said Pottawattomie County District Attorney Richard Smothermon.

    Smothermon, the prosecutor in Thompson’s case, said he offered to cut a deal with him in an effort to save the Oklahoma judiciary from irreparable damage. But Thompson refused and was found guilty of using a sexual device on the bench while presiding over cases. Thompson has been arrested several times since then.

    03/03/2011 Related story: Former Creek County Judge Convicted of Indecent Exposure Arrested for Stalking

    “In the end it made a mockery of the judicial system,” said Smothermon.

    While Thompson may be the worst, he’s not the only Oklahoma judge accused of doing something dishonorable.

    District Judge Jesse Harris made headlines when he was accused of exposing himself to two women in a motel parking lot. Felony charges were later reduced to a misdemeanor.

    In 2005 Court of Criminal Appeals Judge Steve Lile brought shame to one of the state’s highest courts after a sex scandal.

    Right now District Judge Tammy Bass-LeSure is charged with 36 felonies for pocketing thousands of DHS dollars to care for adopted twins who actually lived with someone else.

    1/21/2011 Related Story: Oklahoma Judge, Husband Accused Of Scamming DHS Over Foster Care Reimbursements

    But in all of those cases the accused judge remained on the job or resigned on their own terms. None of them were kicked off the bench, not even Donald Thompson.

    Smothermon said it’s “damn near impossible” to get a judge kicked off the bench.

    Under the Oklahoma Constitution, five entities can ask to have a judge removed:

    The Oklahoma Governor
    The Oklahoma Supreme Court
    The Oklahoma Attorney General
    The Oklahoma House of Representatives
    The Oklahoma Bar Association

    But only one entity, The Court on the Judiciary, can actually remove a judge from the bench. The last time that happened was in 2002.

    “I think we have a trend here to where there’s not enough oversight,” said State Representative Mike Ritze.

    Ritze has asked for a judge’s removal on four separate occasions. Ritze filed House resolutions which could have gone up for a vote by the House. But in each case, the resolution never made it that far. Ritze filed legislation that, had it passed, would allow lawmakers to impeach judges who break the law or make questionable rulings.

    One judge called into question for a ruling is District Judge Thomas Bartheld. Bartheld sentenced repeat child molester David Earls to one year in prison after he plead guilty to raping a 6 year old. Representative Ritze appeared on CNN with Earls’ daughter who was outraged.

    “My father is a monster and he needs to stay, he needs to stay in prison,” said Earls.

    06/20/2009 Related Story: Daughter Says Oklahoma Rapist Deserves Life Sentence

    The Attorney General got involved in the case and a grand jury was set to rule on it when David Earls died in prison.

    Another judge who sparked outrage, District Judge Tom Lucas, who recently reduced a child-murderer’s sentence to 17 years after a jury recommended life. Prosecutors at the Cleveland County District Attorney’s office tried to take their own measures to keep Lucas from presiding over their cases, but those failed.

    03/31/2011 Related Story: D.A. Wants Cleveland County Judge Removed from All Cases

    The Council on Judicial Complaints cannot confirm or deny if they are looking into any judges.

    “If the judiciary is not policing itself, which it appears it is not doing with these four judges out there with these complaints, then who’s going to do it?” asked Ritze.

    The answer may be with the new Judicial Code of Conduct, which went into affect last month. Unlike the code in place for the last fifteen years, this one is mandatory. The rules are binding, enforceable and address specific conduct, including a new rule prohibiting a judge from abusing the prestige of the judicial office.

    Read the new Judicial Code of Conduct


    Richard Smothermon hopes the new code will encourage the state to enforce higher standards for judges and bring credibility back to the bench.

    “The majority of judges are fabulous judges that work hard,” said Smothermon. “But people remember the ones that aren’t.”

    Will the new code actually be enforced? We’ll be watching.

    The process for having a judge removed is still the same, beginning with a complaint that the code of conduct is being violated.

    How to file a judicial complaint

    The new code of conduct also sets new judicial election procedures in place.


  82. Terri In NC says:



  83. Terri In NC says:

    Former S.C. Justice Stevens Criticizes Ruling on Prosecutorial Immunity

  84. Terri In NC says:

    Judge did not take the bench and all we did was change us to counter-plaintiff

    THE ARTICLES OF WAR ARE THE LIEBER CODE, THE UCMJ STARTS AT ARTICLE 142 THE CONTINUATION OF THE LIEBER CODE!!!!! I just bought a manual of courts martial 1949 and it starts with 142 which never made sense to me even while in the Marine Corps now it does this was the continuation of the lieber code!!!!!

    I am sure Rod knows this he was in the military….

    Also wanted to share with you we had a judge not take the bench in a case on Wednesday on proof of insurance a t a pretrial, all we did was change us to counter-plaintiff and made the state the defendant….
    He abandoned the case….amongst other violations we were prepared to bring the hammer in a humble way but never got the chance, when any of us show up at court we are starting to gain a little respect…

    Also here is our new website for Idaho.

    “Alma libertas”
    Steven Monroe

  85. Terri In NC says:

    Florida Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Speedy Trial

    Thanks to Bob Hurt for this important document!

    Subject: [Lawmen: 4335] Florida Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Speedy Trial

    Several years ago, an over-aggressive prosecutor, the infamous Donald Hartery, since forced from Florida’s 12th judicial circuit State Attorney’s Office, charged grandmother and political activist Nancy Grant of Arcadia, Florida with 38 counts of unauthorized practice of law for helping prisoners in the DeSoto County Florida jail file the below motion (also attached as a WORD document). The court should have interpreted the motion as a petition for writ of habeas corpus, but didn’t. A suborned jury convicted Nancy of 19 counts of UPL. She received a sentence of 15 years probation and $30,500 fine, plus assorted costs. She runs a small cattle ranch today and gets around without a driver license.

    Typically, crooked, lazy, indifferent, or overworked public defenders con the prisoner into asking for a continuance without fully realizing that tends to stop the speedy trial clock. State law mandates a trial within less than 45 or 90 days in order to comply with speedy trial right guarantee by constitutions. Thus any such scheme by public defenders amounts to a ruse to deceive prisoners into waiving this right that they should never waive.

    Every prisoner in a Florida county jail who has sat there for 90 days on a misdemeanor or 180 days on a felony charge, without a trial, should file this motion, in my opinion. Read it and you’ll see why I opine as I do.

    Will this turn possible criminals loose? Yes. So what? EVERYBODY should enjoy the exercise of constitutional rights. If courts cannot try the prisoner to trial within the time specified, then courts must let them go. Period. And let us remember the number of people in jail for political reasons on trumped up charges. All should go free immediately.

    An associate of mind with an excellent law background promised three years ago to convert this motion into a habeas petition. He has, I suppose, forgotten all about it. I guess he doesn’t believe habeas has any value any more.

    Subject: [Lawmen: 4335] Florida Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Speedy Trial

    Several years ago, an over-aggressive prosecutor, the infamous Donald Hartery, since forced from Florida’s 12th judicial circuit State Attorney’s Office, charged grandmother and political activist Nancy Grant of Arcadia, Florida with 38 counts of unauthorized practice of law for helping prisoners in the DeSoto County Florida jail file the below motion (also attached as a WORD document). The court should have interpreted the motion as a petition for writ of habeas corpus, but didn’t. A suborned jury convicted Nancy of 19 counts of UPL. She received a sentence of 15 years probation and $30,500 fine, plus assorted costs. She runs a small cattle ranch today and gets around without a driver license.

    Typically, crooked, lazy, indifferent, or overworked public defenders con the prisoner into asking for a continuance without fully realizing that tends to stop the speedy trial clock. State law mandates a trial within less than 45 or 90 days in order to comply with speedy trial right guarantee by constitutions. Thus any such scheme by public defenders amounts to a ruse to deceive prisoners into waiving this right that they should never waive.

    Every prisoner in a Florida county jail who has sat there for 90 days on a misdemeanor or 180 days on a felony charge, without a trial, should file this motion, in my opinion. Read it and you’ll see why I opine as I do.

    Will this turn possible criminals loose? Yes. So what? EVERYBODY should enjoy the exercise of constitutional rights. If courts cannot try the prisoner to trial within the time specified, then courts must let them go. Period. And let us remember the number of people in jail for political reasons on trumped up charges. All should go free immediately.

    An associate of mind with an excellent law background promised three years ago to convert this motion into a habeas petition. He has, I suppose, forgotten all about it. I guess he doesn’t believe habeas has any value any more.

  86. Terri In NC says:

    Notice: This blog is now closed for comments. The information already posted here will remain in place for your future reference, however this site will no longer be monitored due to computer problems I’ve been having.

Comments are closed.